Archive for November, 2009

American Contractor Praises Clinton: A Conflict of Interest?

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009
Ikram Sehgal: Conflict of Interest?

Ikram Sehgal: Conflict of Interest?

In two recent pieces published in The News ‘Just Say No’ and ‘The Ultimate Defining Moment’, former army officer turned security consultant turned defense analyst Ikram Sehgal, praised Hilary Clinton’s recent visit to Pakistan. Since PMW believes in fighting for “A Free, Fair and Factually Correct Pakistani Media” we believe Mr. Sehgal should be upfront and come clean about his own ties.

Mr Sehgal is head of SMS Security Company which is tied up with Wackenhut Services, a US-based private security services provider. Wackenhut-SMS are one of the contractors who provide security to the American embassy and to Americans in Pakistan.
(more…)

UPDATE: Committee to Project Journalists Condemns The Nation

Monday, November 9th, 2009

What are people saying about The Nation?

UPDATE: The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has condemned The Nation for publishing “a reckless and unsubstantiated story”. Last week, Pakistan Media Watch wrote about the incident – in which The Nation published an article with no facts calling an American journalist a spy. Here is what the CPJ wrote today:

Last Thursday, Pakistan’s The Nation newspaper published a reckless and unsubstantiated story accusing Wall Street Journal South Asia correspondent Matthew Rosenberg of being a spy. It’s an accusation that gravely endangers Rosenberg’s safety. Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Robert Thomson responded with a scathing letter to The Nation’s editor, Shireen Mazari, expressing his disgust at the publication of the story, which he called baseless and false. He demanded an immediate retraction.

It’s of course deeply disturbing to us at CPJ that a newspaper would publish a story like this that clearly puts the life of a fellow reporter in danger. But we are also concerned about the source for this scurrilous information, someone the reporter identified as “an official of law enforcement agency, who requested anonymity.” Could this be a deliberate government attempt to intimidate Rosenberg and other foreign correspondents working in Pakistan? That’s a deeply chilling possibility that must be investigated.

In addition, the Managing Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Thomson, wrote a scathing letter to Shireen Mazari conveying his “disgust” over “the slanderous and dangerous falsehoods published on the front page” of The Nation.

Dear Ms. Mazari,

As a fellow Editor, I am writing to convey in the strongest possible terms our dismay and disgust over the slanderous and dangerous falsehoods published on the front page of your newspaper on November 5 regarding our reporter, Mathhew Rosenberg.

Journalism is an important vocation and Pakistan has many fine and courageous journalists who operate in extremely difficult conditions. Foreign correspondents also have an important social role and are similarly exposed to danger from extremists. So for your paper to have suggested, absolutely groundlessly, that Matthew had some intelligence connection was a betrayal of our collective calling and has endangered him, all other Wall Street Journal correspondents, and all journalists and foreign correspondents in your country.

Let me set the record straight: Matthew is an experienced foreign correspondent who has worked for many years covering the region, including Pakistan. In that capacity, he has pursued no other agenda than seeking the truth and has had no other aim than to bring to the world’s attention news and analysis of what is happening in your very important country at a critical time.

Our profession has been done a great disservice by the utterly baseless article, and I call upon you to print an immediate and prominent retraction to ensure that it is widely understood that the piece was without foundation. At present, your paper is is guilty of spreading falsehoods, but it could ultimately be complicit in a far greater tragedy unless this wrong is corrected. We obviously reserve our right to pursue legal action in this instance.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Thompson

Where is the freedom?

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

A view on how the right-wing journalists try to defame and bring down any author or writer who disagrees with their views. It is time such journalists are held accountable and not allowed to merrily trample over any obstacle to their agenda. They are setting double standards when as a source of income they hold politicians accountable everyday, but yet are unwilling to accept any criticism or attempt to be held accountable by others. The beauty of being in a democracy and not a dictatorship is the ability to hold all parties involved answerable for their actions and we must not allow any one to take this liberty away from us!

Lage Raho Media Bhai!

Friday, November 6th, 2009

I don’t know how we missed this the other day, but thank you to Adeel for sending it to us to post! The article below is an excellent example of taking the media to task for ignoring the real stories that are affecting our lives and instead hawking wild conspiracy theories and unfounded rumour. I suppose with our TV anchors so comfortable with their fame and riches, they don’t even see the real suffering of the people.

And remember, if you see any outrageous new items that need to be corrected, please send us an email at: pakistanmediawatch@gmail.com.
(more…)

GEO TV Bullys Bloggers, Offers No Facts

Friday, November 6th, 2009
Hamid Mir: Media Bully

Hamid Mir: Media Bully

Commercial media giant GEO TV has launched an attack on a small blog in a disturbing case of media bullying as popular TV Host Hamid Mir and investigative editor for The News Ansar Abbasi lashed out against the blog “Let Us Build Pakistan,” a blog of PPP supporters that was started in 2008 and is run on the free service “Blogger.com“.

Unlike Hamid Mir and GEO TV, “Let Us Build Pakistan” bloggers Abdul, Sarah, Abbas Zaidi and Socrates, are quite transparent about their political affiliation and agenda and do not misrepresent their beliefs. Despite the transparency of the bloggers, these commercial media giants have bashed them for being propaganda.

Unfortunately, the commercial media journalists embarrassed themselves when they accused the bloggers at different times during the show of being both puppets of the President and CIA and Mossad. Of course, the so-called journalists present no evidence of these preposterous claims. The journalists also accuse the bloggers of causing a rift between media and military as if “media” were the government. Note to Mr. Mir and Mr. Abbasi: despite your face being on TV, you are not elected by anyone to any office.

Furthermore, while Mr. Mir and Mr. Abbasi make accusations against these bloggers, they fail to report that it is the commercial media giants that are causing a rift between military and civilian government and threatening to destabilize Pakistan during wartime.

In addition to presenting no facts or evidence for their accusations, Hamid Mir and Ansar Abbasi have engaged in the sort of media bullying that can create a “chilling effect” that results in citizens being afraid to speak their opinions freely. This is a direct assault on the Fundamental Rights of free speech provided in the Constitution.

Every citizen shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, and there shall be freedom of the press, subject to any reasonable restrictions imposed by law in the interest of the glory of Islam or the integrity, security or defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, [commission of] or incitement to an offence.

Other Pakistani bloggers have begun coming to the defense of “Lets Build Pakistan,” in particular the “Views on Pakistan News” blog by Umair Wasi.

At last media has attacked the websites with all their so called “fair journalism” weapons, last night in capital talk that is hosted by Mr. Hamid Mir on “Geo News” with his 3 guests including Nisar Abbasi a “The News” journalist and Mr. Javaid Hashmi of PML(N) and Sumsam Ali Bukhari of PPP, Hamid Mir has exclusively shown the blog Let Us Build Pakistan maintained by my fellow bloggers Abdul Nishapuri, Socrates, Abbas Zaidi & Sarah, Mr. Hamid Mir and Mr. Nisar Abbasi criticized the blog through out the program with all their white journalism’s’ words, Mr. Hamid Mir highlight the program with the tag of “PPP members criticized army and media” and Mr. Nisar Abbasi added the statement that Let Us Build Pakistan is operated from the presidency.

This is not the first time that media is raising fingers on bloggers and webmasters, but the bloggers are ready to face the situation and will not sit quite at this time it will be dealt accordingly.

GEO TV and The News should immediately reprimand their two employees, Hamid Mir and Ansar Abbasi, for their irresponsible acts and poor journalistic ethics. Additionally, GEO TV and The News should require Hamid Mir and Ansar Abbasi to publicly apologize for their unfounded accusations and promise to never again accuse others without presenting any facts.

The Nation Inciting Murder?

Friday, November 6th, 2009

The Nation Inciting Murder?Weaving fantastic stories out of rumour and innuendo is nothing new to The Nation, but yesterday’s article by Kaswar Klasra represents a new low in journalistic ethics and could result in the murder of fellow journalists.

In yesterday’s article, “Journalists as spies in FATA,” Mr. Klasra claims that journalists in NWFP and FATA are secretly spies for foreign intelligence agencies. While any self-respecting editor worthy of the title would require significant evidence before putting someone’s life in mortal danger by accusing them of being a spy, no such evidence exists in the article.

But Mr. Klasra goes beyond mere conspiracy theory and outright accuses a reporter for the American newspaper Wall Street Journal by name. The reporter, Matthew Rosenberg, has been reporting from South Asia for years, typically publishing articles with such unremarkable titles as, “India Rejects US Carbon Limits Plan,” and “US Courts Former Warlords in Its Bid for Afghan Stability”. Hardly the stuff spy novels are made of.

Instead of facts, Mr. Klasra offers as evidence unsubstantiated anonymous rumours such from “an official of law enforcement agency” and loose innuendo based in unrelated facts. For example, Mr. Klasra quotes a former intelligence officer as saying that the CIA has used journalistic cover in the past. While this very well may be true, the statement does not refer to Pakistan, thus bringing no bearing on the journalists currently reporting from Pakistan. This is a textbook of example of the Fallacy of False Inference.

Mr. Klasra goes on to accuse the reporter of threatening individuals who refuse to themselves become agents. In addition to providing no evidence – not even a fabricated quote by an anonymous “official” – this accusuation by Mr. Klasra is purely ridiculous on its face. What good would a person be as a secret agent if they have to be threatened?

This situation is troublingly reminiscent of the case of another Wall Street Journal reporter, Daniel Pearl. In 2002, Daniel Pearl was brutally murdered in Karachi by al Qaeda terrorists who, like Kaswar Klasra, claimed with no evidence that the journalist was a secret agent – first of the CIA, then of the Mossad. Despite international efforts to gain the safe release of the innocent journalist, the terrorists murdered Daniel Pearl on video camera. We pray this horrific event is not repeated.

Not content with the standard level of sensational tabloid journalism The Nation has come to represent, with today’s article, Mr. Klasra drags The Nation to a new low. That his editor approved the piece demonstrates a level of irresponsibility unrivaled in her field. If any harm comes to Mr. Rosenberg, The Nation will be in part responsible. Kaswar Klasra and his editor, Shireen Mazari, will have the blood of a fellow journalist on their hands.

Shaheen Sehbai: Journalist or Man with an Agenda

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

It is interesting to note that in today’s The News, the OpEd written by Shaheen Sehbai, an Editor in the newspaper, has been relegated to the inner pages. It seems like even The News governing board has realized that Mr Sehbai is not a journalist, but a campaigner. And that his stories are not based on fact, they are based on conspiracy theories

Let us take a look at today’s story titled ‘Where did the minus-1 formula come from?’. In this story Mr Sehbai alleges that there was a one-to-one meeting between the President and the Prime Minister during which certain issues were discussed. Now, if there was no one else present in the meeting and I am sure President Zardari did not provide Mr Sehbai with information about the meeting, then who did? Did Mr Sehbbai receive information from the Prime Minister himself or from his office? Or did Mr Sehbai receive information from those who “listen” to conversations? Maybe that is what Sehbai means when he repeatedly refers to ‘fly on the wall’ informing him about what happened! But if this is the case then his story is totally unreliable and it is time someone exposed these dubious links.

Mr Sehbai’s piece is not a OpEd piece it is fiction. Here are some snippets. First, “…started taking shape in the power corridors of Islamabad and Rawalpindi when coupled with political failures, there was a torrent of reports of corruption, mainly by people associated and appointed by the presidency on key government and corporate positions, with a turnover of billions in shady deals.” Or “Secret meetings with uniformed star officers were held in the wee hours of cold nights.” And “Political amateurs, who had grabbed the high place coming from tiny bit jobs in hospitals, jails, and stud farms or from apartments in exile, could not keep the secret.” Better still, “A Presidency insider narrated the story of how the lifestyles of people around the president had transformed within weeks and months.” If I am not mistaken this is what we read in most mystery or romantic novels!

Mr Sehbai never mentions his sources, all he does is refers to meeting “politicians, retired and working civil and military bureaucrats, journalists and businessmen.”  If there are so many people he has met and so many who are willing to open up to him – as he supposedly argues – why does he have a problem in telling his viewers who these sources are? How is it that Mr Sehbai knows what is happening behind closed doors, in one-to-one meetings, has the confidence of everyone from the media to the civilian to the military establishment? Who gives him all this information? The public has a right to know especially when all he says about his sources is words to the effect, “A fly on the wall said a Maulana would appear regularly in the PM House to take what he needed and this was no secret.”

Or is it possible that Mr Sehbai has his own agenda. Ten years ago in an article in Dawn titled “The Patient and the Surgeon” (October 22, 1999), Mr. Sehbai described Pakistan as a “patient” and General Musharraf as the “surgeon.” Quoting unnamed sources Mr Sehbai advised General Musharraf on what he should do, namely, “General Musharraf cannot dawdle and straggle any more as he is losing the critical strike time that could give him the advantage of an early sweep against the mafias and layers and layers of corrupt elements all over the place. His administration has a very soft face so far and this has not caused enough fear and panic in the ranks of the corrupt. Publicity  of his image of a relaxed  man sitting with his dogs may have waited until he had shown some results.”

If we look at today’s piece Mr Sehbai seems to be doing exactly the same except this time round he is advising Prime Minister Gilani by asking him to come “out of the shadows of Zardari on the one hand and keep the loyalties of as many PPP MPs as possible so that his government’s majority in parliament is not threatened. The Opposition is helping him out, to a degree.” And further, “ The PM should, therefore, stop all such deals and decisions until he becomes a PM in his own right and the decisions are seen as collective decisions to be implemented in a transparent manner and not dictated to suit the deep pockets of presidential friends who have already made billions. The PM, when he gets out of the shadows of the Presidency, will have to catch these big fish to establish his credibility. Nothing short of a massive hunt for such wheeler dealers with a criminal mind will bring Gilani some credit. He has lived too long as a sheepish lame duck.”

So what we at PMW see is a pattern. Mr Sehbai runs campaigns and conspiracies against individuals and then uses his column to propagate these campaigns. This is not journalism, this is campaigning.

Ahmed Quraishi Criticizes VOA, Fails to Disclose He Asked VOA For Job

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Last week, Ahmed Quraishi wrote in The Nation, “VOA takes over PBC?” While Mr. Quraishi was critical of the Voice of America (VOA), he failed to disclose that he previously applied for a job with the same agency.

In his article, Mr. Quraishi refers to the VOA as a “US propaganda network,” but a 2007 article by Shaista Sindhu reveals that Mr. Quraishi had previously applied for a job with VOA and been denied due to discrepancies with his resume.

During the course of applying for the VOA job, Ahmed Quraishi was actively promoted by the Government of Pakistan’s Secretary for Information and Broadcasting Anwar Mahmood who is a key figure in the Musharraf regime’s media handling for several years. Mr Mahmood made calls on Mr Quraishi’s behalf to the then head of VOA Urdu, Brian Silver, who was later removed from his position due to professional reasons.

Mr Silver and Mr Mahmood had worked closely in the run up to VOA getting permission to start an Urdu TV program on the Geo network. The United States government paid Geo for air time in a deal that has never been fully made public. Allegations that could not be independently verified suggest that a Pakistani media company close to Mr Mahmood acted as middle man betweenVOA and Geo at the time and the key individuals on both sides personally benefited from the financial arrangements.

Mr Mahmood also sought the help of VOA’s Islamabad correspondent Ayaz Gul to promote the case of Mr Quraishi. Several senior members of the media cell of inter Services Intelligence (ISI) also put in a good word on Ahmed Quraishi’s behalf. The ISI had earlier succeeded in securing a job at VOA Urdu TV for Faiz Rehman, a pro-government activist with close ties to the Pakistan embassy in Washington. Mr Rehman has now relinquished his job at VOA.

Mr. Quraishi goes on in his article to criticize PBC Director General Murtaza Solgani for having a “policy direction [that] betrays itself in the recent deal and might even be seen as running counter to what Pakistan should be pursuing in terms of its own public diplomacy,” despite his admitting that Solgani “is a professional radio journalist by the testimony of most of those who worked with him.” This is, as with his omission of his previous attempt at working for the organization, troubling as it suggests that Mr. Quraishi believes in a policy “political litmus test” for journalists. Such a test would clearly, especially in a government funded operation, result in a propaganda machine rather than an unbiased reporting outlet.

Mr. Quriashi’s failure to disclose his failed attempts to obtain a job with the VOA in an article represent a disconcerting lapse in journalistic ethics and should be soundly reprimanded by his supervisors at The Nation. In the future, we suggest Mr. Quraishi fully disclose any relationships he has had with a person or organization before he offers a critique.

Editorial Provides Insight Into Mazari's Lunacy

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

It’s not particularly difficult to find contradictions and outright misstatements in the work of Shireen Mazari, but yesterday’s editorial in The Nation proves particularly insightful into Mazari’s special kind of luncay.

The editorial in question takes on an important topic – the need for a vibrant opposition in democratic politics. But the editorial is so filled with logical fallacy and misunderstandings of democratic process that it cannot go without comment.

First, the editorial notes quite correctly that:

The country is reeling under the growing terrorism that has come to occupy centre stage and created uncertainty and fear in every household as schools have had to be closed; and the next generation of the country has had to grow up prematurely.

But Mazari’s solution is not to take the fight to these dastardly terrorist child-killers, instead she blames the government for carrying out debates about legislation that Mazari does not favor! It’s as if Mazari believes that the Parliament is her own personal kingdom.

The editorial goes on to claim, quite outrageoudly, that PML-N is providing too little opposition to the PPP government. This claim is ridiculous in on its face, but especially in light of the recent exposure of secret meetings with the military in which Shahbaz Sharif attempted to destabilize the elected government:

Sources told The News that President Asif Ali Zardari, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and even Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar were caught off guard when the media reported the details of the secret meeting between the top leaders of PML-N with General Kayani. The sources even claimed that these frequent secret meetings between the top leaders of PML-N and the Chief of Army Staff as confirmed by Ch Nisar Ali Khan in his speech in the lower house the other day, might well have given the required confidence to the top guns of the GHQ to send the tersely worded press note to the media after the corps commanders meeting.

The immediate result of this secret meeting with General Kayani was that the very next day, to the much surprise of the PPP rulers at Islamabad, Shahbaz Sharif launched lethal attack against the Kerry-Lugar Bill.

Mazari has conveniently ignored the fact that the problem is not a lack of opposition in Islamabad – an absolutely absurd claim – but that the opposition is putting its short-term interest of power above the good of the country and risking a destabilizing nightmare.

The editorial is correct when it says that ,”Within a Parliamentary system, it is equally incumbent upon the elected opposition to raise an alternate voice within the Parliament, including casting negative votes on issues which it opposes as being counter to the country’s interests.” But Mazari seems not to understand that properly functioning democracies do not play black-bag games and plan secret meetings in attempts to destablizine democratically elected governments. Rather, the opposition should be raising questions and debating legislation – exactly what has been happening in the Parliament.

The way she discusses democracy, one would expect a game of chess against Mazari would end with her throwing all the pieces off the board, waving her arms in the air, and screaming checkmate. She neither understands the proper way to play, nor has the grace to play with class.

The ultimate aim of a democratic government is to protect the rights and freedoms, the future and prosperity of the people. It is not a game to be manipulated for the career of one individual. A proper opposition is essential to a prosperous democracy. Let’s hope Mazari someday learns what that really means.

Hillary Clinton is a fascist? Give me a break!

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

To me, the word “fascist” conjures images of World War II, crowds of people changing and cheering in support of Mussolini and Hitler. It’s a pejorative word, describing a radical perspective that supports authoritarian government and is on the far right of the political spectrum.

When I read Hamid Mir’s column, Liberal Fascism, I was completely confused by his assertion that Hillary Clinton is a fascist. I continued through it, and realized he had just finished Jonah Goldberg’s book, also titled “Liberal Fascism,” and no doubt it was weighing on his mind as he asked three questions of Secretary Clinton and found her answers unacceptable. He is, of course, entitled to his opinion of her answers but the fact remains, calling her a fascist is utterly unfounded. It continues the ugly name-calling and adrenaline-filled style we see in Pakistani media, and does absolutely nothing to improve US-Pak relations.

Let’s take a moment to discuss Goldberg’s book. He launches into rants against the liberal movements in the United States, going so far as to call Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy American fascists. For Goldberg, pushing forward the ideas and agendas of a party equals fascism. That is a grossly unfair standard and cruel label, and is applicable only to the Democratic Party. For example, he strongly condemns Kennedy’s urging of national service and volunteerism as the government controlling the lives of its citizens. Yet, the menacing horror of the McCarthy era escapes his notice. The sweeping changes of President Ronald Reagan do not make it into this book. President Bush’s bulldozing the nation with his agenda (political, economic AND social) does not show up in here, either.

To make something very, very clear: none of the aforementioned men are fascists in anyway. Goldberg fails to understand that when a political party is in power, it will do its best to push its agenda through. That goes for Republicans or Democrats. As FDR changed the country, so did Reagan. Neither are fascist. America has not had a fascist President. Goldberg should be condemned for using that label in his disgustingly partisan, biased and vicious book.

Those, however, were the thoughts percolating in the mind of Hamid Mir.

Calling one of the most liberal, open-minded and ardent supporters of Pakistani democracy a fascist is deplorable.