Archive for January, 2010

The expertise of the 'experts'

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Media ExpertsTV talk shows are filled with experts on all subjects. In fact, there are so many experts these days, it is a wonder if anyone is not an expert.

Jamal Hussain is a retired Air Commodore, former director Centre for Aerospace Power Studies PAF Base Faisal, Karachi, and former Commandant Joint Services Staff College. With all of his knowledge and experience, one might also say he is an expert. But Mr. Hussain does not like to be called ‘expert’ when he appears on TV since he says that word has become so misused that it has lost all meaning.

In his column in today’s Daily Times, Mr. Hussain points to a troubling problem with media, and lists specific examples of where so-called ‘experts’ were influenced in their speaking by their personal biases. Far from saying that we should try to magically erase all personal bias, Mr. Hussain makes a more modest proposal, and one that would be an easy remedy: Simply have the TV talk shows reveal the bias of the so-called ‘expert’ before and after he speaks.

This way, the people can judge for themselves if the speaker is neutral or, if he has some bias, it can be considered with his remarks.

(more…)

The Nation Is Incorrect About How Democracy Works

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Courts and JusticeThe Nation’s editorial, “A democratic attitude,” says that “the practice almost unexceptionally followed by successful democracies in the world” is for everyone accused of corruption to resign and present themselves to a court. This is not true.

  • French President Nicolas Sarkozy was accused of taking kickbacks from arms dealers when he was a government minister under President Chirac. Sarkozy was never forced to step down from political office, and the accuser – former PM de Villepin – is being sued in what is known as “the Clearstream case.” In fact, former French President Chirac’s lawyer has argued that his client enjoyes immunity for acts carried out while president. Actually, there are several politicians including Ministers and Presidents who are accused in this case, and the trend is not for them to step down, but for the judicial process to proceed normally with a presumption of innocence.
  • American President Bill Clinton was accused of corruption while he was the president in what is known as the “Whitewater controversy.” During this case the president and his wife who is now the American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were investigated by the US government while they were in power. They never resigned. After many years, the investigation did not charge them with any illegal acts.
  • British PM Tony Blair was accused of corruption while he was in office and was even questioned by police. The case involved accusations that his political party was given secret loans and that donors were nominated for honours. Tony Blair did not step down.
  • Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi is actually on trial for corruption while he remains in office. In fact, the Italian government is considering a proposal to suspend the trials in preparation for elections.

This is not an excuse for corruption, or to say that corruption should be tolerated. And yes there are many political leaders who, when corruption has been proven, either resign or are removed from office. But The Nation’s suggestion that it is typical practice in successful democracies for politicians accused of corruption to resign is false. Actually, the opposite is true. In successful democracies, politicians have the opportunity to defend their name before they are forced to resign. Otherwise, it is not democracy but a coup.

Whether or not any specific Pakistani or foreign politician should resign or appear before court is not for us to say. But if The Nation wants that to happen, they should at least be honest and not misrepresent how successful democracies work.

Media Distortion

Monday, January 11th, 2010
Journalists respond to Peshawar Press Club attack

Journalists respond to Peshawar Press Club attack

Syed Irfan Ashraf has a great column in today’s Dawn about the dangerous and difficult job performed by journalists. Actually, this job is made dangerous by those people who want the media to be not fair and unbiased, but only pushing a particular point of view.

The article mentions a particular incident that highlights the unfortunate result of this pressure against journalists who are trying to do a good job:

All too often journalists find themselves in a tight spot. In a talk show a Voice of America host unexpectedly asked a local journalist in Swat as to who was responsible for violating last February’s accord for the implementation of the Sharia in Malakand — the Taliban or the army? The baffled reporter from Express TV reluctantly replied that it was neither the Taliban, nor the army but the people!

In this way the reporter tried to escape the wrath of the real violators by putting the responsibility on the victims. Unfortunately for him, this did not do the trick. He soon received a call from a militant who reprimanded him for spouting utter nonsense and for not telling the ‘truth’ that the security forces were responsible.

The two groups that are criticized in the article are militants and state agencies. Obviously, militants believe that they can threaten and silence the media, for example the incident of the Peshawar Press Club bombing. And there have also been some cases of state agencies putting pressure on individuals as well, not only in Pakistan, but in all countries. And there are, sadly, even some pressures from politically motivated media like the case of The Nation accusing reporters of being spies.

The result of this pressure and intimidation is that media starts to become distorted in order to avoid making any trouble. This can be seen in the case quoted by the article above, or in the case of pop music made in last year’s video featuring Ali Azmat talking about how Taliban is not a problem. In the video, even the Noori brothers say that they don’t want to criticize Taliban because they don’t want to be targets. These are famous pop stars! How can a typical journalist even compare?

(more…)

Could Media Start Nuclear War?

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

There are many negative outcomes that can result from media providing misinformation and exaggerated claims: uninformed public, destablized government, and international embarrassment for example. But lately media has been playing a most dangerous game with exaggerated misinformation, namely the statement of Indian General Deepak Kapoor.

Gen. Kapoor’s statement, to be clear, was completely irresponsible and I do not defend his statement at all. But let us look at what was actually said, and how this has been interpreted in the media.

Gen. Kapoor said that he believed there was the potential for a limited war between India and Pakistan under a nuclear overhang. As both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers, there is obviously some “nuclear overhang” to any battle between the two. But the media immediately began to say that the Indian was threatening nuclear war, which has the obvious result of setting back any peace process and making unnecessary fear in the minds of the people.

Retired Air Vice Marshal and formed Ambassador Shahzad Chaudhry noticed this right away:

Just a couple of weeks back General Kapoor opined that a ‘limited’ war was possible under a nuclear overhang. The statement got morphed and misrepresented as if he had spoken of a ‘limited nuclear war’.

This same observation was again made recently by Abbas Rashid in his column, “The difficult road to peace.”

Consider, for example, the bolt from the blue delivered last November by none other than the Indian army chief about the possibility of a limited conventional war between the two countries under a ‘nuclear overhang’. It was a highly irresponsible statement and not one for him to make, in any case. It did not help that on our media it was more than once articulated as ‘limited nuclear war’ by talk show hosts and guests, underlining the need for a greater sense of responsibility and professionalism on the part of the media.

In many matters, media misinformation and exaggeration can be simply an annoyance. But when it comes to the delicate peace between two nuclear powers, the stakes are too high for the media to play to the gallery and exaggerate the statements of Indian generals, no matter how ridiculous they are. Mr. Rashid’s advice would be well considered by media commentators:

The media too needs to play a supportive role rather than focusing disproportionately on the negative aspects, and resist the temptation of playing to the gallery. The South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA) has been doing useful work in this context for some years now by facilitating extensive interaction between media persons belonging to the region, not least those from India and Pakistan. This has contributed to greater sensitivity to each other’s perspectives and concerns. But there is obviously a long way to go as was so clearly depicted by the media coverage in the aftermath of the Mumbai terror attacks of November 2008. In that context it is certainly good news that two large media groups in Pakistan and India have joined hands in a commitment to work for peace between the two countries. Both have extensive outreach and can also help in setting the tone for many others in the media whose role has not been particularly helpful. 

Topsy-Turvy Kal Tak

Friday, January 8th, 2010
Kal Tak Ignores The Real Story

Kal Tak Ignores The Real Story

Sometimes the timing of the media is almost too much to notice without breaking into a great laughter. Take for example the latest episode of Kal Tak and then the next day’s Daily Times column by Dr. Masooda Bano. Let us look at these two media types next to each other.

First, Mr. Chaudhry spent the entire show talking about the various crises in the country. Listening to Kal Tak, one could easily believe that the end of the world is coming. Democracy is nowhere to be seen, law and order is completely absent, and only corruption is behind every door. The government is a complete failure, and PPP is secretly planning to repeal the constitution! No need to provide any evidence for any of these claims. It is enough to watch the TV ratings race to the sky to feel sufficiently justified.

Meanwhile, there are of course no conspiracies against the government at all. If one were to believe Mr. Chaudhry, though, shouldn’t there be some conspiracy? After all, it seems that according to Kal Tak, the government is going to end the world!

Obviously, this is all topsy-turvy. Actually, the government is not ending the world. Certainly there are many problems in Pakistan. Yes, there is some corruption. But why is Chaudhry talking about corruption when there was another explosion in Karachi, this time jihadis blowing themselves up on accident before they had a chance to find some school. Is paying some ghoos to the post office a larger problem than this?

And as for there being no conspiracy against the President. Maybe there is not. But can anyone be surprised to think otherwise? How many times will TV anchors make predictions on the air about Zardari being removed from office before it starts to sound like a conspiracy? It was only a few months ago that Anjum Niaz was predicting that there was a conspiracy between the Americans and Musharraf to abuse the President. This article was widely circulated by people like the Master of Conspiracies Ahmed Quraishi who has said on TV himself that he thinks the government should be toppled.

I will not chronicle all the media talk about getting rid of Zardari. If you watch TV even sometimes you will know them well.

With this in mind, I found it quite interesting to read Dr. Masooda Bano’s column, “Planned hype,” in the Daily News. Reading this with Kal Tak still fresh in my mind made me laugh out loud. I laughed at the ridiculousness of Kal Tak an its companions, but I also felt great relief that there is someone of sense writing in the media and making the most important point of all — Pakistan’s media is finally free, but with this freedom comes a great responsibility. I hope Mr. Chaudhry reads The Daily News.

The Nation fails to do homework for latest editorial

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

 

Stratfor research does not support The Nation's claims

Stratfor research does not support The Nation's claims

 

Only two days after their failed attempt to blame the government for problems at the Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL), The Nation’s editorial writers published a new hyper-dramatic editorial declaring that the US is targeting Pakistan. After reviewing the evidence used by The Nation as well as actually reading the news this morning, it has become obvious that The Nation failed once again to do their homework before they published a sensational – and misinformed – editorial.

(more…)

UPDATE: The Nation Eats Crow

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010
Dinner for The Nation editorialists

Dinner for The Nation editorialists

Only yesterday we proved the bias and incorrectness of The Nation’s editorialists. Imagine our surprise to read Dawn today only to see more evidence that The Nation wrote its rabid editorial without any facts. It is today reported that a week before The Nation published their editorial, the government was seeking information from the Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) for not adhering to procurement rules and for the unreasonable delay in the installation of compression facilities at Qadirpur, which has left the country’s third largest gas field on the brink of collapse.

Before The Nation’s editorialists next decide to write a rabid critique of ‘failure of governance’, perhaps they ought to pick up the telephone and call someone at the government to find out what are actually the facts.

The Nation's Accusations Go Up In Smoke

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010
The Nation's accusations go up in smoke

The Nation's accusations go up in smoke

The Nation blames a ‘failure of governance’ for reports that the Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDCL) will not meet its yearly target for oil and gas extraction, despite the fact that the government has actually made improvements to the oversight of the OGDCL only a few weeks ago. These facts, presumably, do not fit The Nation’s predetermined political goal of criticizing the government, though, so were conveniently left out of their editorial.

The Nation did not mention that only a few weeks ago, the government removed five OGDCL directors after learning of a conflict-of-interest.

The government has removed, with immediate effect, five members of the board of directors of OGDCL, the country’s largest oil and gas producer.

The action was taken amid a conflict of interest pointed out by intelligence agencies in the restructuring of the Pakistan State Oil board.

A notification issued by the petroleum ministry did not give any reason for the removal of directors of OGDCL. Those who have been removed include Tariq Iqbal Khan (chairman of NIT), Waqar Malik (chief executive of ICI Pakistan), Rafiq Dawood (head of Dawood Islamic Bank), Sikandar Muhammad Khan (head of the Sugar Mills Association) and Sikandar Hayat Jamali.

The newly-appointed directors are: Senator Mohammad Ismail Buledi from Balochistan, chief secretary of Balochistan Nasir Mehmood Khosa by designation, Kaiser Bengali (renowned economist) and comparatively unknown Fahad Sheikh and Syed Masieh-ul-Islam.

A premier intelligence agency had complained to the prime minister that most of the recently-appointed directors of the PSO board were close friends of people in the PSO management and had conflict of interest with the company.

Sources in the Prime Minister’s Secretariat told Dawn that the agency had also raised questions about over Rs6.5 billion inventory losses faced by PSO.

Additionally, there have actually been some improvements in the energy sector in recent months, though a reader would not know this from reading The Nation’s editorial.

Dawn reported on 12 November that the Pak-Arab Refinery Limited (PARCO) is a 5-billion-dollar oil joint project between Pakistan and UAE.

Millions of dollars has also been dedicated to increased oil and gas exploration on two blocks granted by the federal government.

The Pakistan Petroleum Limited (PPL) on Thursday intended to invest over $17.05 million on the development of its two oil and gas exploration blocks granted by the federal government.

The PPL has been awarded licences to carryout exploration and production of oil and gas on the two blocks –Jungshahi and Gambat South – in Zone-III comprising area of 2,459 and 2,436 square kilometers, respectively.

The development work of the phase-I is estimated to span over three years in order to discharge its minimum work commitment of 1,705 work units through acquisition, processing and interpretation of 2D/3D seismic and drilling of exploration wells.

PPL is Pakistan’s oldest and largest Exploration and Production (E&P) company and operates five fields including Sui, Kandhkot, Mazarani, Adhi and Chachar with the overall daily production of 786 MMCF of gas, 4,989 barrels of oil and 150 metric tonnes of LPG.

Presently, the company is working in seven different exploration blocks namely Nushki, Dhadar, Khuzdar, Hala Kalat, Bahawalpur East and Barkhan as an operator having working interests in 15 other exploration blocks operated by various E&P companies.

Recently, the E&P company has made a gas/condensate discovery over Adam X-1 exploratory well in its Hala exploration block, which is being appraised by them through EWT operations.

The licences and the Petroleum Concession Agreements were signed by, Petroleum and Natural Resources Secretary Mehmood Salim Mehmood on behalf of the president of Pakistan, General Petroleum Concessions Director Mohammad Naeem Malik, PPL Managing Director Khalid Rahman. The execution ceremony was graced by Federal Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources Syed Naveed Qamar with his presence.

The OGDCL may have problems, but that’s not to say that these are the fault of the government, or that the government is not doing anything to improve the OGDCL and the energy sector entirely.

In fact, the energy sector in Pakistan has been making some recent improvements, including the government removing members of the OGDCL board for conflict-of-interest. Blaming the government for corruption at OGDCL just weeks after the government takes a major step towards eliminating corruption at the OGDCL and while millions of dollars in new exploration and refinery is being invested is disappointing. The Nation’s editorial staff appears to be either unaware or unconcerned with the topics they are writing about, which does a disservice to their readers.

Sindh is in Bolivia

Monday, January 4th, 2010

An excellent post by Mr. Imran Baloch on his Skeptic Life blog about the pseudo-intellectuals that somehow have come to speak so loudly in the media even though they have their facts so sorely incorrect. It is bloggers like this that make us think there is some hope that the media will turn around someday and provide a proper service to the people.

I just got to know that pseudo intellectuals on Pakistani junk Urdu channels believe that Sindh is not part of Pakistan but it is somewhere located in Bolivia, Nigeria or in Papua New Guinea.

BBC Urdu bloggers are thought provoking; lately I came across an interesting blogpost written by Wusatullah Khan, he writes “President Zardari during his recent visit to President Karzai’s oath taking ceremony in Kabul, wore Sindhi cap, it is so sad that one local TV showed two pseudo intellectuals alleging Zardari for using Sindh card. They further discussed that representing country in regional dress is not at all acceptable”.

Another interesting argument I came across, whenever an Army dictator ‘we had so many, we are a Generals producing nation’ visits abroad in Army uniform no body mentions it as Fauji “Army Card”. If Prime Minister visits in tie suit, nobody dare to say it is Western Card. If any leader lands in Riyadh in Kameez Shalwar, no one mentions, its a Punjabi, Pakhtun, Sindhi, Seraiki or Baloch Card but pseudo intellectual thinks if one wears Sindhi cap, it weakens the essence of federation!!!

Same mindset, labeled Bengalis traitors, even they were on the forefront in Pakistan movement, reason was, they refused to wear Kameez Shalwar and Jinnah Cap. Around 37 years ago, when Sindh province wanted Sindhi to be provincial language, same mindset chanted slogans “ Urdu Ka Janaza Hay, Zara Dhom Say Niklay” “ Death of Urdu Language”. It resulted in bloodbath, one would never forget.

Wusatullah makes an interesting point, he mentions, “If we allow these pseudo intellectuals, they will remove Jinnah’s pictures in Lakhnavi Pajama citing that it was an Indian card, in Qurakali Cap citing it was Baloch card, in English hat citing it was an imperial card. They may burn Iqbal’s picture in red Turkish cap, alleging him for playing Turkish Card.

Lastly he mentions that these pseudo intellectuals do no know that in 1947 when Sindh Assembly passed resolution for joining Pakistan, Muslim parliamentarians were wearing Sindhi Cap. These people don’t know that Sindhi cap is also worn in Punjab, NWFP, and Balochistan and in Afghanistan.

To conclude, how long we let these naïve pseudo intellectuals, who don’t know anything about history , culture and geography to come on TV and divide all of us ???

Babble Media Mujahids

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Nadeem Paracha never fails to leave me laughing. Today’s Dawn includes his latest “Smoker’s Corner” about the media Talibans or what he calls “Babble Media Mujahids.” In his usual biting manner, Mr. Paracha’s witty satire really puts the ridiculous of some of the media talking heads into perspective. As infuriating as it is to read or listen to these individuals, if you sit back and look at them through the lens of Mr. Paracha’s satire, you really see them for the silly little people that they are. It is like the story of the Emporer’s Clothes. Everyone takes these chattering heads so seriously, but then Paracha comes around and says, “What are you people doing? These people are not wearing any clothes!” and the ridiculousness of the BMMs is finally easy for everyone to see.

(more…)