<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grading Shireen Mazari&#039;s Faisal Shahzad Conspiracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/</link>
	<description>Pakistan&#039;s media is finally free...but is it fair and factual?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:26:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-3895</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-3895</guid>
		<description>@Serpentbearer I have simply taken Shireen Mazari&#039;s own words and compared them to factual evidence for which I provided sources. You claim that she is above reproach just because you say so. Nobody is above reproach and everyone is responsible for their own words. I don&#039;t know who these &quot;defense experts&quot; are that you are in contact with, nor do I care. If they ignore facts then they are hardly experts regardless of their salary.

You also claim that the government is inept and corrupt. What does that have to do with Shireen Mazari&#039;s article about Faisal Shahzad that this post examines? Nothing. It is irrelevant. And we do not defend the government except when they are lied about or misrepresented, just as we have defended Nawaz Sharif and others when they were slandered. Just because you don&#039;t like Zardari or Nawaz or anyone else doesn&#039;t give you the right to make up stories to defame them. Think about what you believe, don&#039;t just believe it.

Also we are not &quot;bent on defending Clinton&quot; and I would not say that Musharraf lied in his book when he revealed that comment. But this is a perfect example of your error: That comment was not made my Clinton who was not even in office at the time but rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article647188.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it was said by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage&lt;/a&gt;.

As you see, sometimes the things that you believe are not quite as they seem. I have no doubts that Shireen Mazari is intelligent, but that does not give her the right to mislead people by twisting other people&#039;s words and promoting conspiracy theories. Facts are facts, even if they are inconvenient to a particular world view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Serpentbearer I have simply taken Shireen Mazari&#8217;s own words and compared them to factual evidence for which I provided sources. You claim that she is above reproach just because you say so. Nobody is above reproach and everyone is responsible for their own words. I don&#8217;t know who these &#8220;defense experts&#8221; are that you are in contact with, nor do I care. If they ignore facts then they are hardly experts regardless of their salary.</p>
<p>You also claim that the government is inept and corrupt. What does that have to do with Shireen Mazari&#8217;s article about Faisal Shahzad that this post examines? Nothing. It is irrelevant. And we do not defend the government except when they are lied about or misrepresented, just as we have defended Nawaz Sharif and others when they were slandered. Just because you don&#8217;t like Zardari or Nawaz or anyone else doesn&#8217;t give you the right to make up stories to defame them. Think about what you believe, don&#8217;t just believe it.</p>
<p>Also we are not &#8220;bent on defending Clinton&#8221; and I would not say that Musharraf lied in his book when he revealed that comment. But this is a perfect example of your error: That comment was not made my Clinton who was not even in office at the time but rather <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article647188.ece" rel="nofollow">it was said by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage</a>.</p>
<p>As you see, sometimes the things that you believe are not quite as they seem. I have no doubts that Shireen Mazari is intelligent, but that does not give her the right to mislead people by twisting other people&#8217;s words and promoting conspiracy theories. Facts are facts, even if they are inconvenient to a particular world view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serpentbearer</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-3877</link>
		<dc:creator>Serpentbearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 06:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-3877</guid>
		<description>Dr. Shireen Mazari is a woman of great intellect as anyone with the slightest interest in defense issues knows. I&#039;ve been reading her columns for quite a few years and never have I come across something &quot;crazy&quot;. Nor have I or any defense experts that I&#039;m in contact with ever judged her columns as a &quot;hodge-podge&quot;.  All sane Pakistanis know that our ambassador and this regime is in united states&#039; back pocket. So please, stop defending this inept, corrupt government. Their designs in Pakistan are known to all and they are available on Google, since you learn everything by searching on it. When someone declares it, you label her as a conspiracy theorist. 
To make a small point after reading this inane piece of writing, I see you&#039;re really bent on defending Clinton. would u say that Musharraf lied in his book too when he revealed the &quot;we will bomb you back to the stone age&quot; comment of the US??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Shireen Mazari is a woman of great intellect as anyone with the slightest interest in defense issues knows. I&#8217;ve been reading her columns for quite a few years and never have I come across something &#8220;crazy&#8221;. Nor have I or any defense experts that I&#8217;m in contact with ever judged her columns as a &#8220;hodge-podge&#8221;.  All sane Pakistanis know that our ambassador and this regime is in united states&#8217; back pocket. So please, stop defending this inept, corrupt government. Their designs in Pakistan are known to all and they are available on Google, since you learn everything by searching on it. When someone declares it, you label her as a conspiracy theorist.<br />
To make a small point after reading this inane piece of writing, I see you&#8217;re really bent on defending Clinton. would u say that Musharraf lied in his book too when he revealed the &#8220;we will bomb you back to the stone age&#8221; comment of the US??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sameer</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>sameer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 03:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton did threaten Pakistan

read this article

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8669512.stm

This is what she said &quot;We&#039;ve made it very clear that if - heaven-forbid - an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton did threaten Pakistan</p>
<p>read this article</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8669512.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8669512.stm</a></p>
<p>This is what she said &#8220;We&#8217;ve made it very clear that if &#8211; heaven-forbid &#8211; an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whats In a Name</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Whats In a Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I wonder what people like the auhtor of this article would get in promoting US interests and foreign policy.

The illegitimate and evil ways of the US are a known fact to the entire human poppulation, still some amongst us stand up for it, for a small worldly gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what people like the auhtor of this article would get in promoting US interests and foreign policy.</p>
<p>The illegitimate and evil ways of the US are a known fact to the entire human poppulation, still some amongst us stand up for it, for a small worldly gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nation&#8217;s Casual Propaganda &#124; Pakistan Media Watch</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nation&#8217;s Casual Propaganda &#124; Pakistan Media Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-515</guid>
		<description>[...] Nation is no stranger to conspiracy theories. Perhaps they should take a look at their own practices, though, if they want to find some really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nation is no stranger to conspiracy theories. Perhaps they should take a look at their own practices, though, if they want to find some really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Sad for Shireen Mazari &#124; Pakistan Media Watch</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>How Sad for Shireen Mazari &#124; Pakistan Media Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 18:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] has blinded her too often to the realities under her own roof. It has led her to concoct the most ridiculous conspiriacy theories, so poorly constructed a school child could disprove them quite easily. She has aligned herself [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has blinded her too often to the realities under her own roof. It has led her to concoct the most ridiculous conspiriacy theories, so poorly constructed a school child could disprove them quite easily. She has aligned herself [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arshad</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Arshad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-513</guid>
		<description>Every one having bit acquaintance with Journalism would be well aware of the role of” The Nation” and Shirin Mazari. “ The Nation always supported right wing of extremists and promoted pro- Taliban policies. Hussain Haqqani is quite right that in the name of Jihad, extremists are killing innocent people, bombing mosques and destroying buildings. Which sort of Jihad and Islam is this? Islam simply says, murder of an individual is par with murder of entire community”.

As far as Shirin Mazari is concerned, I simply say, she is the spokesperson of Taliban, whose sole aim is to defend the brutal policies of Taliban and extremists.  In a recent gimmickry,  Shireen Mazari has written the master piece of conspiracy literature about the Faisal Shahzad case. Which was totally fake and based on mere wrong information? In his dusty article she blamed Hussain Haqqani that “ our Ambassador to Washington maintain a strange silence in the immediate aftermath instead of seeking access to Faisal Shahzad, given that despite being a US citizen his Pakistani links were being played up? But Ambassador to Washington Husain Haqqani was on CNN News to discuss the incident. Also he was in all of the newspapers with some statements. Does Shireen Mazari not read the news herself? “The Nation is only against Hussain Haqqani as he is against sympathizers of extremist elements while as a sole and major sympathizer of Taliban, The Nation has launched a constant maligning campaign against Hussain Haqqani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every one having bit acquaintance with Journalism would be well aware of the role of” The Nation” and Shirin Mazari. “ The Nation always supported right wing of extremists and promoted pro- Taliban policies. Hussain Haqqani is quite right that in the name of Jihad, extremists are killing innocent people, bombing mosques and destroying buildings. Which sort of Jihad and Islam is this? Islam simply says, murder of an individual is par with murder of entire community”.</p>
<p>As far as Shirin Mazari is concerned, I simply say, she is the spokesperson of Taliban, whose sole aim is to defend the brutal policies of Taliban and extremists.  In a recent gimmickry,  Shireen Mazari has written the master piece of conspiracy literature about the Faisal Shahzad case. Which was totally fake and based on mere wrong information? In his dusty article she blamed Hussain Haqqani that “ our Ambassador to Washington maintain a strange silence in the immediate aftermath instead of seeking access to Faisal Shahzad, given that despite being a US citizen his Pakistani links were being played up? But Ambassador to Washington Husain Haqqani was on CNN News to discuss the incident. Also he was in all of the newspapers with some statements. Does Shireen Mazari not read the news herself? “The Nation is only against Hussain Haqqani as he is against sympathizers of extremist elements while as a sole and major sympathizer of Taliban, The Nation has launched a constant maligning campaign against Hussain Haqqani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humaira Rashid</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Humaira Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto’s final book ‘Reconciliation’ says in its acknowldgements section: Acknowledgments from ‘Reconciliation’ by Benazir Bhutto

“To Husain Haqqani, who played a vital role in providing guidance and criticism, especially invaluable on the theocratic foundations of Islam and the history of Pakistan – a loyal friend whose counsel to both the author and the collaborator will always be cherished.”

A man of whom Benazir Bhutto had such a high regard must be counted as an asset by the Pakistan People’s Party. These are troubled times. The anti-democratic forces are all set to create rifts in the single largest political force holding the Federation of Pakistan together. Reactionary politics and irresponsible propaganda will lead us to another disaster. Shireen Mazari is spokesperson of Tehreek-e-Insaaf, a pro-Taliban party. She spares no opportunity against H.H. These people are real nemies of Pakistan and democracy. These people like Shireen Mazari are ruining democratic set. They must be discouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto’s final book ‘Reconciliation’ says in its acknowldgements section: Acknowledgments from ‘Reconciliation’ by Benazir Bhutto</p>
<p>“To Husain Haqqani, who played a vital role in providing guidance and criticism, especially invaluable on the theocratic foundations of Islam and the history of Pakistan – a loyal friend whose counsel to both the author and the collaborator will always be cherished.”</p>
<p>A man of whom Benazir Bhutto had such a high regard must be counted as an asset by the Pakistan People’s Party. These are troubled times. The anti-democratic forces are all set to create rifts in the single largest political force holding the Federation of Pakistan together. Reactionary politics and irresponsible propaganda will lead us to another disaster. Shireen Mazari is spokesperson of Tehreek-e-Insaaf, a pro-Taliban party. She spares no opportunity against H.H. These people are real nemies of Pakistan and democracy. These people like Shireen Mazari are ruining democratic set. They must be discouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehsun</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehsun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with your English, though I do not agree with your views. One piece of advice, keep on writting whatever you believe in and do not worry about these pretentioners - you know what &#039;sort&#039; are they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with your English, though I do not agree with your views. One piece of advice, keep on writting whatever you believe in and do not worry about these pretentioners &#8211; you know what &#8216;sort&#8217; are they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Shaheen</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2010/05/13/grading-shireen-mazaris-faisal-shahzad-conspiracy/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Shaheen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 04:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=823#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Well written.

Good job, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written.</p>
<p>Good job, keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

