Archive for the ‘The Nation’ Category

Misinformation Dominates Raymond Davis Conspiracies

Wednesday, March 9th, 2011

Conspiracy theories continue to dominate the coverage of the ongoing Raymond Davis saga, and it seems that the wilder and less supported by evidence, the more popular the conspiracies become.

Ata Rabbani writes in The Nation that Raymond Davis was part of a secret plot to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. In the first sentence of his column, Ata declares that Raymond Davis is not a diplomat. He later undermines his claim when he says, “Not being a legalist, I would refrain from referring to the Vienna Convention”. If Ata Rabbani admits he is not a legalist and would refrain from referring to the Vienna Convention, how can he make declarations about diplomatic immunity which is defined by the very treaty that he says he is not qualified to discuss?

Ata Rabbani later incorrectly claims that Raymond Davis “annual remuneration is three times more than the other hired American secret undercover agents”. According to research conducted by The News, the median income of security contractors in Iraq was $445,000. According to documents released by the FO, Raymond Davis salary was $200,000, which would mean that rather than three times more, it is actually only half the median salary for similar jobs.

Knowing that Raymond Davis salary was less than half the median salary for similar jobs, the claim of Ata Rabbani that “it is because he is entrusted with a special and exceedingly sensitive job” becomes impossible. Furthermore, it renders completely ridiculous his further suggestion that the facts “all point to the Americans being after their life-long objective in Pakistan: our nuclear capability.”

What should also be examined is why reporters continue to refer to the salary of Raymond Davis as “$0.2 Million” instead of $200,000 which is not even a quarter of a million dollars? Could it be that this is intended to leave readers with the impression that Raymond Davis is a millionaire when in fact his salary is less than the typical pay for these security contractors?

Then there is the column by Sultan M Hali which perpetuates the ‘transparently silly’ conspiracy theory that Raymond Davis was delivering nuclear weapons to al Qaeda.

Gp Capt (Retd) Air Force S.M. HaliUnder the garb of diplomats, the US government managed to place intelligence, security and guerrilla warfare experts in its embassies and consulates in Pakistan. These estimated over 3000 operatives have been conducting an internecine warfare within Pakistan. They have managed to infiltrate the Taliban and Al-Qaeda network and create their own Tehrik-e-Taliban (Pakistan) force, which has been recruited, trained and equipped by these CIA operatives to target Pakistan Army personnel, Armed Forces installations, markets, hospitals, schools and public places to destabilize Pakistan. The Soviet Intelligence Agency SVR has disclosed that RAD and his network have provided Al-Qaeda operatives with chemical, nuclear and biological weapons so that installations in the US may be targeted and Pakistan is blamed and pressed to do more of the US’ dirty work like conducting operations in North Waziristan.

 

Not only does this article promote a conspiracy theory that is simply ridiculous on its face, but also the author cannot get the basic facts correct. He claims that “over 3,000 operatives” have been in Pakistan. This would mean that every single American granted a visa was a spy!

But that is not the only bit of misinformation. The author’s claim that the CIA created TTP is laughable. American drone strikes killed the leader Baitullah Mehsud in 2009, and these supposed CIA terrorists attack the CIA itself.

The author goes on to ask why no high level targets are killed by drones, ignoring the fact that it was a CIA drone strike that killed Baitullah Mehsud himself. He also ignores statements by Pakistani officials that CIA drone strikes have passed up opportunities to kill high level targets in order to protect the lives of innocent civilians.

Perhaps all of this misinformation should not be such a surprise. You will recall that the author S.M. Hali is connected to the ‘virtual Think Tank’ O.M. Center for Policy Studies that we exposed last week as a possible propaganda ring. Putting his name to articles that are filled with such obvious misinformation, it is not unreasonable to wonder if he is honestly mistaken or if he is bald faced lying. One cannot help but ask what is his true agenda, and why Pakistan Observer is willing to print such poor commentary.

Pakistan Media Termed ‘Conspiracy-Palooza’

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Wired logoAmerican news magazine Wired has termed the Pakistani media ‘Conspiracy-Palooza’ due to the number of conspiracy theories being circulated about the Raymond Davis case and notes that such rumours are fueling the very crisis. The article specifically mentions the role of The Nation and Express Tribune in spreading “transparently silly stories”.

Al-Qaeda’s nuclear arms dealer? The top recruiter for the Pakistani Taliban? A terrorist “mastermind?” These are just some of the explanations that have been picked up by the Pakistani press ever since Raymond Davis, an employee of the U.S. embassy in Pakistan, shot two Pakistani men he claimed were menacing him on the streets of Lahore.

The nature of Davis’ work — now acknowledged to be on contract for the CIA — and the prolonged vacuum of information regarding it has invited in a host of outlandish theories to fill the void.

Early on in the Davis affair, The European Union Times, an online news site printed a transparently silly story about Davis running weapons of mass destruction for al-Qaeda.  You see, a Russian intelligence report indicated that Davis had documents detailing U.S. shipments of”nuclear fissile material” and “biological agents” to al-Qaeda for the purpose of starting a world war that would restore the American economy to global dominance. Absurd as it is, the story has since been picked up by Pakistan’s The Nation, as well as by Pakistani journalists on press listservs and Twitter.

The narrative of the U.S. colluding with terrorists to attack Pakistan was later taken up by the Express Tribune , which ran a story claiming that Davis had gone rogue on the U.S. and started working for the Pakistani Taliban. “Davis was instrumental in recruiting young people from Punjab for the Taliban to fuel the bloody insurgency,” according to an anonymous senior police official from Punjab quoted in the story. The source called Davis’ arrest a “blessing in disguise” because he was suspected of “masterminding terrorist activities in Lahore and other parts of Punjab.”

In support of the allegations, the Tribune quotes more anonymous sources claiming Davis’ cell phone records indicate he was in contact with members of the Pakistani Taliban the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, another Pakistani terrorist group.

Of course, those phone records, if valid, could also be the hallmarks of someone spying on, rather than recruiting for, Pakistani terrorist groups, as the CIA now claims was Davis’ job.

But the choice of interpretation speaks to a deep distrust among the Pakistani public of the United States and its covert war in the country. Last week, Pakistani sources claimed (fairly dubiously) that the Davis shootings were responsible for a month-long halt in drone strikes. Now, as Pakistan’s intelligence service warns of a “split” with the CIA over the incident, all eyes are again looking to see whether the already tense relationship will buckle under the weight of public outrage, distrust and the rumors that help fuel it.

Media’s ‘Myopic Zeal’ and Political Bias

Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

The political bias of certain journalists is well documented. Nor is this a problem unique to Pakistan Nobody questions the conservative leaning of FOX News (USA), the liberal leaning of The Guardian (UK), or the establishment credentials of The Nation (Pak). When one looks to these media groups, the perspective that will be used is already well known. But unlike most other countries, Pakistan’s media is infested with political operatives who work under the cover of journalism. While such blatant propaganda operations may exist on the fringes of the international media, they are routinely found in the heart of our own mainstream press. This raises the question of whether Pakistan’s media can truly be fair and neutral while it lacks basic ethical guidelines around political propaganda.

In America, TV anchor Keith Olbermann was suspended and ultimately fired by MSNBC News after it was revealed that he was giving large financial donations to political candidates in direct contradiction to ethics rules.

“Anyone working for NBC News who takes part in civic or other outside activities may find that these activities jeopardize his or her standing as an impartial journalist because they may create the appearance of a conflict of interest,” the NBC News policy reads. “Such activities may include participation in or contributions to political campaigns or groups that espouse controversial positions. You should report any such potential conflicts in advance to, and obtain prior approval of, the president of NBC News or his designee.”

Another prominent American TV network, CBS News, fired four employees including eminent anchor Dan Rather after it was discovered that they had run a false story attacking George W. Bush.

The action was prompted by the report of an independent panel that concluded that CBS News failed to follow basic journalistic principles in the preparation and reporting of the piece. The panel also said CBS News had compounded that failure with a “rigid and blind” defense of the 60 Minutes Wednesday report.

Asked to resign were Senior Vice President Betsy West, who supervised CBS News primetime programs; 60 Minutes Wednesday Executive Producer Josh Howard; and Howard’s deputy, Senior Broadcast Producer Mary Murphy. The producer of the piece, Mary Mapes, was terminated.

“We deeply regret the disservice this flawed 60 Minutes Wednesday report did to the American public, which has a right to count on CBS News for fairness and accuracy,” said CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves.

The panel said a “myopic zeal” to be the first news organization to broadcast a groundbreaking story about Mr. Bush’s National Guard service was a key factor in explaining why CBS News had produced a story that was neither fair nor accurate and did not meet the organization’s internal standards.

Obviously American media – home of FOX News – is no group of angels, and political bias exists there as well. But where in our own media can we point to high profile journalists and anchors being held to account for their political bias and inaccuracies?

The Nation is often blatantly partisan, on Sunday offering unqualified faith in PML(N).

One is certain that the Punjab government that is led by Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, will do everything under the law to arrest the culprits.

Syed Ali Raza Abidi may masquerade as a journalist, but his true profession as political operative is quite obvious to anyone who cares to look. He maintains a profile on the website www.allaboutmqm.org, and photos of him as an MQM activist are spread across the internet. Yet when publishing his writing, Express Tribune describes him only as, “A businessman who writes on politics and civic issues”. Aaj TV describes him as “A businessman and a young politician.” Abidi’s MQM activism is never mentioned in his by line, yet the writing of this ‘businessman’ follows a trend that is invariably pro-MQM and anti-government.

When MQM introduces a de-weaponization bill, Syed Abidi is there to support it in the media. This same ‘businessman’ also offers backhanded praise to the PM for ‘bailing out a failing government’ while saying that “Hopefully the MQM and PML-N have reminded you of what your priorities should have been in the first place”.

Syed Ali Raza Abidi MQM operative

Of course, Abidi is not alone and today’s examples are not the first people to use the profession of journalism as a path to Islamabad. Let us not forget that PML(N) MNA Ayaz Amir and PPP MNA Sherry Rehman were also journalists prior to their careers in politics. Nor is this to say that journalists must be devoid of personal political beliefs, nor does it mean that journalists should never change careers to politics. Actually both Ayaz Amir and Sherry Rehman were excellent journalists and also excellent MNAs. But if a journalist decides to change careers and go into politics, it should be a mystery to the public which party they will choose, so well hidden were there own political beliefs from their reporting.

Some of this problem is likely the result of the growing number of newspapers and TV channels that require more and more content to attract their audience and advertisers. Pakistan does not have enough trained and qualified journalists to fill the necessary positions. As a result, anyone who can write well and produce content for these groups is accepted. Becoming an ‘analyst’ is even easier. There one often simply needs a phone.

One part of the solution is for media groups to adopt corrective systems that ensure accuracy and accountability. Zohra Yusuf, Creative Director, Spectrum Y&R, makes an excellent suggestion in a piece for Aurora Magazine.

The answer to instilling responsibility in the media does not lie in any form of government control or oversight. The days of censorship should be firmly behind us. There are many workable and proven structures and systems of media monitoring and complaints commission available. It is the will that is needed and the consensus among media organisations not only to acknowledge the issue of accountability but to work towards setting in place corrective systems. The Express Tribune has done well to announce the appointment of Justice (Retired) Farkruddin G. Ebrahim as an ombudsman for the newspaper. In fact, it published all his contact details as well, encouraging readers to send their complaints to him. However, a solo effort by a small newspaper will have little impact unless major news organisations make a similar joint commitment.

By developing internal systems to hold journalists accountable for the accuracy of reports, media groups would ensure their own independence and freedom as well as their long-term business model. The more newspapers and channels enter the media space, being the first with ‘breaking news’ is already having diminishing returns. People see a report early, but they don’t believe it. That creates an opportunity for media groups to compete for the title of ‘most accurate’.

But ombudsmans and internal controls must also deal with certain questions of journalistic ethics such as what it means to be a reporter and what it means to be a political operative. Pakistan has no shortage of drawing room politicians. What we are desperate for are qualified journalists.

The Nation’s Jihadi Propaganda

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

The Nation has long held onto the Nazariya-e-Pakistan philosophy of the Zia years, Majid Nizami even going so far as to brag in his official biography that “General Zia-ul-Haq recommended him as a nominee to the Shura”. (It should be noted that Nizami incorrectly says that the Shura was the parliament, when in all actuality it was Zia’s hand-picked group of advisors.) But The Nation of 16 February was like a time capsule left over from the Zia era and shows that sections of the media remain more focused on ideology than news.

Gen. Zia ul HaqIn Wednesday’s newspaper, The Nation‘s Opinion page was dominated by a piece by the late Brigadier General S.K. Malik – a favourite of Gen. Zia-ul-Haq’s and the author of jihadi field manual, The Quranic Concept of War. Most Opinion articles are used to explain or analyse current events. The Brig (R) Malik piece published by The Nation, “Holy Prophet’s Defence Policy” was noticeable because it does not appear to address any specific current issue. But this piece of Zia-era propaganda did not appear in a vacuum. Rather it appeared on the same page as two editorials that were over-the-top in their bald face anti-India stance.

The first editorial about Law Minister Babar Awan’s statement against  the arrest of Rahat Fateh Ali goes beyond what the Law Minister said and claims that the arrest shows that India is “inimically opposed to the very existence of Pakistan and to Pakistanis”. Nawa-i-Waqt even takes a direct swipe at competitor media group Jang Group by saying, “those who propounded the Aman ki Asha had carried out Aman ki Nirasha”. This editorial quotes from Law Minister Babar Awan’s own statement to media on the subject from Monday, but it is expanded on his statement by even criticising Awan for not taking “the same position with the elements in government who are eager to engage in a dialogue with India”. The Nation uses the arrest of Fatah Ali Khan to request the government to cease talks with India until Kashmir is settled, even though these are unrelated issues.

This was followed by a second editorial that again refers to “New Delhi’s deadly machinations on our soil”. Most irresponsibly, The Nation even goes as far as threatening ‘nuclear clouds’ if India does not settle the Kashmir issue ‘as early as possible’.

The next page which claims the headline of ‘Analysis’ includes two pieces by General (Retd) Mirza Aslam Beg and S.M. Hali which are virulently anti-American and anti-British in their content by claiming that these Western countries are anti-Muslim in their policies. In the case of Gen (R) Beg’s column it also takes the tone of pro-Islamist sympathies and supporting Zia-era policies of propping up a puppet Islamist regime in Kabul as a policy of ‘strategic depth’.

Gen. Mirz Aslam BegNevertheless, the US and its allies are allergic to Islamists coming to power. For example, Hamas won the elections in Palestine, but was not allowed to form the government, and thus the Israelis are now facing the consequences. Similarly, the mujahideen in Afghanistan, who fought the war to expel the Soviets, were not allowed to form the government and were pushed into a contrived civil war. And now, as they emerge the winner, efforts are afoot to deny them their due share in power. This obsession, in fact, has been the cause of the American defeat in Afghanistan. They have lost the war in Afghanistan, but find it difficult to rationalise the defeat without hurting their ego and pride as a superpower.

Gen (R) Beg also praises “towering personality like Imam Khomeini of Iran” and the Islamic Revolution in Iran, but he ignores the fact that the people of Iran are rising up to protest the Islamic regime. Gen (R) Beg also praises Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood for the revolution that overthrew the dictator Honsi Mubarak, even though that was a revolution of the people, not Muslim Brotherhood and protesters there told journalists that “The Brothers have been effectively sidelined”.

Gp Capt (Retd) Air Force S.M. HaliThe article by S.M. Hali criticises UK PM David Cameron for speaking against Islamic militancy even though the British PM clearly stated that it is not Islam or the Ummah which is committing acts of terrorism but only a small group of extremists. S.M. Hali admits this point, but then says that Cameron’s proposal for “greater integration of Muslim minorities” into British culture. Hali accuses the PM for stirring ‘a hornets nest’, but is he not doing the same with a provocatively titled piece, ‘Cameron targets Muslim community’? It would be pertinent to note that S.M. Hali is the same ‘defence analyst’ who termed the cricket scandal a RAW conspiracy. Neither did The Nation inform readers that S.M. Hali is also a military man since he is Group Captain (Retd) of Pakistan Air Force.

Any one of these pieces by itself may not be worthy of notice, but taken together as the complete package of opinions and analysis by retired military in one issue of The Nation must raise eyebrows. It is a demonstration that far from being an ideology of the past, Zia’s manipulation of religious sentiments is being used again to hypnotize the masses. Obviously The Nation can take whatever position they choose on issues, but when a package of clear ideological indoctrination surfaces, it is proper to ask whether Nawa-i-Waqt is serving the cause of informing the people or promoting pro-jihadi ideologies left over from the Zia era.

Valentine’s Day at The Nation

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

The Nation may think that it is very clever, but once again it has missed the glaringly obvious. In the Wednesday edition of the newspaper a cartoon is featured on the Opinion page depicting Fauzia Wahab taking a rose to Raymond Davis. The cartoon includes the caption, “Valentine’s Day observed with full fervour in Pakistan”.

The Nation Cartoon of 16 February 2011

But The Nation missed the real story which was that some people actually did take Valentine’s Day treats to a confessed killer, only the gunman was not Raymond Davis but Mumtaz Qadri.

Boys take Valentine's Day treats to Mumtaz Qadri

Express Tribune reported the incident, including the statement of Qari Hanif Qureshi that even though Valentine’s Day is haram he would allow it since it was honouring the killer.

Students brought Valentine’s cards and flowers on Monday to the detained self-confessed killer of one of Governor Punjab Salmaan Taseer.

Qari Hanif Qureshi, a firebrand speaker and apparent inspiration for Qadri, also said Valentine’s Day was not Muslim.

“It is wrong to celebrate it, but since these students have come to express their love and support for Qadri, we cannot turn them away.”

It  is true that some people have used Valentine’s Day to shower flowers on a killer, but it is not the killer that The Nation would have its readers believe. Rather than report the truth, The Nation twists the facts. Once again, readers of The Nation will be misinformed about the actual current events of the country since the editors are willing to sacrifice facts to promote a political agenda.

Poor Reporting on Raymond Davis Confusing Issues

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

The Raymond Davis case continues to dominate media headlines, though the people are probably more confused than ever about the facts due to poor reporting on the issue.

Ansar Abbasi has termed the issue in The News ‘the Lal Masjid of present govt’, a term he appears to have borrowed from Hamid Gul.

“A national consensus has developed on the issue of Davis. The people demand his trial here and are not ready to see him going in US hands without being punished,” former ISI chief Lt Gen (r) Hamid Gul said, warning that if the man is given back to Washington it would not only depress ordinary Pakistanis but would serve as another Lal Mosque disaster.

Hamid Mir’s report in The News is seasoned with such phrases as “imperial arrogance” and “shady secret agents”. He then quotes anonymous ‘diplomats’ that make sensationalist claims such as, “tomorrow Raymond Davis type secret agents may kill more people in other capitals of the world and then the US will claim diplomatic immunity”, or compare Raymond Davis to Taliban and al-Qaeda terrorists. It must be noted that Taliban and al-Qaeda terrorists do not have any claim to diplomatic status.

Other reports in The News have quote Munawar Hassan terming MNA Fauzia Wahab’s statement that Raymond Davis is entitled to diplomatic immunity as “a disgrace to the ‘Shuhda’ of Pakistan”, once again invoking ghairat in place of actual facts on the law.

This is a similar position taken by The Nation which published an editorial today which says,

It would seem that asking for his release is morally wrong of the US, and, at the same time, handing him over to Washington would demonstrate Pakistan’s undue weakness, reflecting its unhesitating compliance with the US commands, right or wrong.

Pakistan Today published the headline ‘Charge Raymond under anti-terrorism sections’ and quotes from the bereaved families of the dead men. Certainly this is an emotional issue, but emotions should not have bearing on the facts.

Dawn published one of the worst examples of emotional manipulation and terrorising the people which is Mohsin Hamid’s article comparing Americans to hunters paying to kill Pakistanis in cold blood.

So what is going on? Who is Raymond Davis, and what are people like him doing in Pakistan? I’ve read articles likening him to Rambo and RoboCop. But I believe another Hollywood film franchise metaphor is more apt. Predator.

The Raymond Davis affair has brought home what should have been obvious to us Pakistanis for a long time. Pakistan has become a game preserve, a place where deadly creatures are nurtured, and where hunters pay for the chance to kill them.

What is missing from all of these discussions is the fact that the issue rests on one question only which is does Raymond Davis enjoy diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Conventions, not on emotional manipulation, ghairat, or sensational horror stories about Americans hunting Pakistanis in the streets.

This poor reporting has not been unnoticed by Dr Syed Mansoor Hussain, who writes in Daily Times that every journalist who terms Raymond Davis as ‘Rambo’ should be forced to sit through the movies until they know what they are talking about.

It was also interesting that some ‘intrepid’ journalists started to refer to Davis as ‘Rambo’. Clearly none of them had ever seen a Rambo movie. Rambo, as they should know, is always on the right side of morality, always gets his man, always escapes the clutches of evil, sadistic and clearly bigoted oppressors and tormentors by killing most if not all of them. And yes he never wears a shirt. So for those who continue to compare Davis with Rambo and do so without having any idea what Rambo represents should in my opinion be forced to see all the Rambo movies one after another for three days in a row without being allowed to fall asleep.

Dr Hussain’s point is on worth thinking about because, as he points out the case is being exploited for political agendas

The Davis scenario is getting progressively complicated. The reason is politics. Anti-American sentiment is rampant in Pakistan and anything which even remotely reeks of pro-Americanism is immediately seized upon by the religious parties and politicians of a ‘certain’ predisposition to vilify the present government of Pakistan.

Though Dr Hussain writes specifically of relgious parties here, the same can be said of the media. When Ansar Abbasi is not taking advice on diplomacy from Hamid Gul, he proposes there is a threat of ‘a possible Hollywood Rambo-style sting operation by the US forces to get Raymond Davis released’. The Nation, never one to be easily outdone in anti-American zeal, uses the term ‘Rambo’ over 100 times since the incident!

All of this fills the pages with spicy and sensational stories that may sell to an audience which is hungry for action movies. But while we are filling our bellies with this channey, our minds are starving for relevant facts and information. Instead of demanding that the US stop pressurizing the government on Raymond Davis diplomatic status, the media should stop playing the anti-American card and give the reader something that will help him understand the situation, not give him indigestion.

Cover up is always worse than the crime

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

The Nation logoAs was reported by most news agencies yesterday, PEMRA imposed fine on two TV channels for projecting terrorists, showing blood and gore. The two TV channels are Samaa TV and Waqt TV.

Waqt TVDespite this official press release, The Nation published an article on page 12 headlined:PEMRA denies fining Waqt TV. According to this article the newspaper Pakistan Today was “had been asked to publish a contradiction and also apologise”.

Rather than publish a contradiction and also apologise, however, Pakistan Today has a follow up article which reports PEMRA has sent a letter has been sent to CEO Waqt TV Nidai Millat directing to “pay the fine within 15 days and abstain from airing such footages of dead bodies, bloodshed and the interviews of terrorists in future.”

Strangely, even though The Nation denied that Waqt TV was fined by PEMRA still it felt the need to publish an Editorial condemning the fine. In the course of their Editorial, The Nation mocks PEMRA as unintelligent.

It thus became obvious that PEMRA, instead of being an independent regulator, was comfortable with the role of a tool of the government for suppressing the freedom of press and the free flow of information. This exercise of discretionary power was particularly blatant because it should have been obvious to PEMRA that the supposed interview consisted of existing video footage put together. It is frightening enough to learn that PEMRA lacks the expertise to make such a distinction, and it is even more frightening that the government has found itself in the position of such lack of intelligence.

It should be noted that Waqt TV is owned by Nawa-i-Waqt media group which also owns The Nation.

Two questions are raised by this situation.

First, how did such an obviously inaccurate story as to claim that no fines had been issued get past the editors? Surely this would have been caught as incorrect since the newspaper was preparing for the very same day an editorial condemning the fines.

Second, given that Waqt TV and The Nation are owned by the same media group, was this an intentional effort by Nawa-i-Waqt group to misinform its readers due to the embarrassment of having Waqt TV subjected to PEMRA fines?

It is not clear if this was a case of intentional or unintentional mistaken reporting. What is clear is that The Nation not Pakistan Today owes its readers a contradiction and an apology.

Special thank you to dear reader Farrukh for bringing this story to our attention! If you see something inaccurate, inappropriate or unprofessional in media, please report a tip and we will research and post on the item.

Did Cameron Munter Say US Has Right To Interfere In Pak Affairs?

Sunday, January 9th, 2011

Cameron MunterA recent speech by Cameron Munter has taken on a life and a meaning all its own thanks to the ‘spin doctors’ at our media groups. Rather than reporting the actual statements, media groups are adding an interpretation of their own which reinforces predetermined ideas, but does not accurately reflect the statements of the American official.

As is well known by now, the new American Ambassador Cameron Munter in a speech at the Islamabad Programme in Global Studies, a think tank, included the following statement about US interest in Pakistan’s economic affairs. A full transcript of the statement is available from the home page of the US Embassy web site. Now, let us consider this statement in its full context and not cut and pasted as it appears in the newspapers.

The second criticism is that we have been intrusive on financial and governance issues — that we have been demanding where we should be respectful. Well, the reality is that we are both. We are demanding and respectful. And we will continue to be so when defending or promoting rights and obligations that have been incorporated into multilateral agreements or are accepted universal principles.. But I would add that we make every effort to do so with full respect for and understanding of Pakistan’s traditions, culture and legal and constitutional history.

If we seem intrusive, it is because we care. We are Pakistan’s largest donor. Our aid comes as an outright grant of assistance, which is very different from offering loans that must be repaid. Therefore, we need to be sure that the American taxpayers sees that any foreign government, including yours, is making good use of its resources and responding effectively to its citizen’s needs in a transparent and accountable manner. A large proportion of our aid projects, in fact, are built around the idea of helping Pakistani government institutions – be they federal, provincial, or local – become more responsive. We could just build roads or schools and be done with it. But how would they be sustained? Who would staff and maintain these structures in years to come? That is why we focus so much on helping Pakistan build effective state institutions and a robust economy.

The American Ambassador is clearly saying that, because the US is granting direct aid and not making loans to be repaid, they want to know that their money is not being misused. For a media that collectively seems to think the most important issue facing the nation is corruption, one might be forgiven for thinking such an assurance that the US is not willing to fund corruption would be welcomed. Furthermore, the Ambassador never says that the US has a ‘right’ to interfere – what he actually says is that the US may ‘seem’ intrusive because of its concerns, and then he explains why this is a mistaken impression. Actually the Ambassador says quite explicitly that even when the US gives some advice, it does so “with full respect for and understanding of Pakistan’s traditions, culture and legal and constitutional history”.

But it appears that another one of the media’s bogey men is more easily attacked here – American interference. With the actual context of the statement now easily before our very eyes, let us review a sample of the headlines that have appeared in popular newspapers:

The News (Jang Group): U.S has right to interfere in Pakistan’s economic, governance affairs: Munter

The Nation: U.S has right to interfere in Pak affairs: Munter

Despite the alarmist headlines and the way the reporters and editors cut and pasted Ambassador Munter’s statement, the fact is he never said US has a right to interfere in Pakistan’s affairs. That never happened.

The closest to correct is Dawn‘s headline: Munter’s blunt talk: we pay so we intrude, but even this article begins with a claim that “US Ambassador Cameron Munter has justified American meddling in Pakistan’s ‘financial and governance’ matters for being its largest aid provider.” By using words such as ‘justified’ and ‘meddling’, what we have here is the reporter, Baqir Sajjad Syed, inserting his own bias that does not appear in the transcript.

As is clear to anyone who will read the full speech, Ambassador Munter said that the US wants to be certain that Pakistan “is making good use of its resources and responding effectively to its citizen’s needs in a transparent and accountable manner.”

Again, with the constant refrain from Jang Group and The Nation that a culture of corruption in government is ruining the country, you would think these media groups would be cheering for Ambassador Munter’s call for transparency and accountability.

Far from being a statement that the US has bought the right to interfere with Pakistan’s affairs, Ambassador Munter sounds more like any responsible investor. Surely the US would not be providing billions to Pakistan if it did not believe the country will succeed. But like a man that invests in his brother’s business, he wants to help his brother succeed not only by providing a financial investment but by giving some advice on how the investment can be used to maximize the return.

It should also be noted that none of the newspapers appear to have called the Embassy to ask for a clarification of the statement. Rather the reporters and editors simply cut and pasted the Ambassador’s words and gave their own interpretation. In other countries, journalists will give the courtesy of contacting officials to get a statement and will print that statement in their article so that readers have all the facts and all sides of the story and can make up their own minds.

It appears that in this case, the news media has jumped on an opportunity to twist the words of an American diplomat to promote the belief that the US is duplicitous in its support for Pakistan. As happens far too often, once a transcript of a statement is reviewed, it becomes apparent that what is being reported is not objective facts but a political agenda. Perhaps Ambassador Munter should have chosen his words more carefully. Now that he has been introduced to the way our media is willing to twist people’s words, he surely will the next time.

The Nation’s Confused IMF Conspiracy

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The Nation logoIt was only two days ago that the IMF approved a nine-month extension of Pakistan’s Stand-By Arrangement. Which means that it took The Nation less than 36 hours to invent a new conspiracy to explain how the decision is a tool of American hegemony and government corruption.

The Nation makes several accusations against both the IMF and the government. Most notably by impugning the IMF’s rationale for supporting Pakistan’s economy.

…the IMF’s wider agenda, that of ensuring that the USA’s will is done, should not be lost sight of.

But China is an IMF member country. So is Saudi Arabia. And while the US has the largest quota of a single country, the EU has a combined vote of 32% – almost twice that of the US. In fact, historically the IMF’s managing director has been European, not American, the present Managing Director being Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a Frenchman. For the IMF to be a blatant tool of American interests, one would have to accept that the US was controlling China, Russia, Venezuela and other nations that traditionally oppose or resist American interests. It’s simply beyond reason.

The newspaper goes on to suggest that the US via the IMF is using “the charge of corruption…as a stick to beat the government into obedience”. Ironic considering one of the key themes of The Nation has been cries of rampant corruption in the government. Should we surmise from this, then, that The Nation too is a puppet of American interests?

What makes the claim particularly ironic, however, is that The Nation actually accuses the government of devising the RGST scheme to protect its own corruption!

The plea that is used by the IMF for the RGST is the improvement of the tax:GDP ratio. If that is the case, why would the IMF want the imposition of a tax that would only cause inflation, while the Pakistani state left a major sector, that of agriculture, untaxed. The problem is that agricultural incomes appertain to those in the legislatures, on both sides of the political divide, and they use these positions to prevent any tax being levied on the incomes which enable them to live a life of leisure enlivened only by politics.

If The Nation is correct (which is certainly disputed by many economists) that the RGST will cause inflation in affected sectors, isn’t it also possible that the government did not apply the tax on agriculture in order to protect the common people from price hikes on food essentials?

Regardless of one’s position on the proposed RGST, claiming that it is a conspiracy by the US to keep Pakistan’s cooperation in the war against terrorist militant groups is just silly. Development economists from various nations have made critical analysis of the IMF and its policies in the past. Some of those critiques have resulted in changes to IMF structure and policies as the economic firm adapts to more effectively aid nations hit by economic downturns and natural disasters.

Reading The Nation, however, one could easily believe that the newspaper would rather the economy sink just to spite the present government. Whatever its intentions, though, the logic and analysis of its editorial page is deplorable.

The Lowest Depths of Media Irresponsibility

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

I planned to write about a couple of items that have been in the news lately that I thought warranted addressing. For example, the article of 20 December, ‘Nawaz to support PPP in Centre, claims Shujaat’ which included the description of PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif as “the so-called opposition leader”. It is unclear if this was a quote of PML-Q President Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, but the way it is presented in the article makes it seem as though it was the opinion of the reporter criticising Nawaz Sharif for cooperating with the government.

However, such items – while important – pale in comparison to the disastrous media circus that has been unleashed today surrounding an alleged gang rape of a young woman and the beating of her friend. The treatment of this case in the media has been deplorable, and while it is certainly indefensible to politicise reporting, the defamation and endangering of a young woman is the height of journalistic irresponsibility.
(more…)