Posts Tagged ‘Dawn’

House of Dawn Journalist Attacked

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

The latest attack on a journalist in Pakistan has taken place against Dawn journalist Azaz Syed on Tuesday morning. The attack prompted a protest by journalists covering the National Assembly who walked out.

The attackers are currently unknown, but Mr. Syed says that he recently filed reports critical of the military.

Syed declined to say who he thought might have been behind the attack but said he had filed reports critical of the military.

“They were not in favour of Pakistan’s military establishment,” he told his television station, referring to his reports.

He said he was about to file another report and had received a communication that he should not. He did not say from whom.

DawnNews has filed complaints with a variety of authorities to bring quick resolution to the matter:

The DawnNews management has taken strong notice of the incident and is dispatching letters to President Zardari, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gillani, Information Minister Qamaruzzaman Kaira, Interior Minister Rehman Malik, Defence Minister Ahmed Mukhtar and DG ISPR Major General Athar Abbas as well as journalist unions and human rights organizations.

President Zardari has said that government believes in freedom of the media and is committed to strengthening democracy in the country. Let’s hope that he follows through on this pledge by making a full inquiry into this incident and seeing that any attackers are brought to justice. In order for media to be truly free, it must be free from threats and harassment.

Media Distortion

Monday, January 11th, 2010
Journalists respond to Peshawar Press Club attack

Journalists respond to Peshawar Press Club attack

Syed Irfan Ashraf has a great column in today’s Dawn about the dangerous and difficult job performed by journalists. Actually, this job is made dangerous by those people who want the media to be not fair and unbiased, but only pushing a particular point of view.

The article mentions a particular incident that highlights the unfortunate result of this pressure against journalists who are trying to do a good job:

All too often journalists find themselves in a tight spot. In a talk show a Voice of America host unexpectedly asked a local journalist in Swat as to who was responsible for violating last February’s accord for the implementation of the Sharia in Malakand — the Taliban or the army? The baffled reporter from Express TV reluctantly replied that it was neither the Taliban, nor the army but the people!

In this way the reporter tried to escape the wrath of the real violators by putting the responsibility on the victims. Unfortunately for him, this did not do the trick. He soon received a call from a militant who reprimanded him for spouting utter nonsense and for not telling the ‘truth’ that the security forces were responsible.

The two groups that are criticized in the article are militants and state agencies. Obviously, militants believe that they can threaten and silence the media, for example the incident of the Peshawar Press Club bombing. And there have also been some cases of state agencies putting pressure on individuals as well, not only in Pakistan, but in all countries. And there are, sadly, even some pressures from politically motivated media like the case of The Nation accusing reporters of being spies.

The result of this pressure and intimidation is that media starts to become distorted in order to avoid making any trouble. This can be seen in the case quoted by the article above, or in the case of pop music made in last year’s video featuring Ali Azmat talking about how Taliban is not a problem. In the video, even the Noori brothers say that they don’t want to criticize Taliban because they don’t want to be targets. These are famous pop stars! How can a typical journalist even compare?

(more…)

The Nation fails to do homework for latest editorial

Thursday, January 7th, 2010

 

Stratfor research does not support The Nation's claims

Stratfor research does not support The Nation's claims

 

Only two days after their failed attempt to blame the government for problems at the Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL), The Nation’s editorial writers published a new hyper-dramatic editorial declaring that the US is targeting Pakistan. After reviewing the evidence used by The Nation as well as actually reading the news this morning, it has become obvious that The Nation failed once again to do their homework before they published a sensational – and misinformed – editorial.

(more…)

UPDATE: The Nation Eats Crow

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010
Dinner for The Nation editorialists

Dinner for The Nation editorialists

Only yesterday we proved the bias and incorrectness of The Nation’s editorialists. Imagine our surprise to read Dawn today only to see more evidence that The Nation wrote its rabid editorial without any facts. It is today reported that a week before The Nation published their editorial, the government was seeking information from the Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) for not adhering to procurement rules and for the unreasonable delay in the installation of compression facilities at Qadirpur, which has left the country’s third largest gas field on the brink of collapse.

Before The Nation’s editorialists next decide to write a rabid critique of ‘failure of governance’, perhaps they ought to pick up the telephone and call someone at the government to find out what are actually the facts.

Attacking the Messenger

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

 

Dawn reporter M.H. Khan following attack

Dawn reporter M.H. Khan following attack

The recent attack on Dawn reporter M.H. Khan is shocking. Threats and intimidation against journalists has become too commonplace, but usually we expect these attacks to be carried out by Taliban and other militants. The fact is, attacks on journalists is simply uncivilized. That this attack was allegedly carried out by political supporters of SNF makes it all the more shocking. We should expect more civilized behavior from legitimate political parties.

(more…)

NRO Expired but Heavens Didn’t Fall

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

If I were an alien from another planet who had descended on Pakistan in October 2009 and were solely dependent on the print and news media for information I would be under the mistaken assumption that all Pakistan’s problems would be solved if only two things happened – NRO was withdrawn and corruption ended. I would have no knowledge of the threat from extremism, the need to build the economy and the need to invest money for social development.

For the last one month Pakistani media’s reporting has centered on the ‘NRO.’ Here is a sampling of headlines from leading papers – “Finally dreaded NRO list is out and official,” “NRO beneficiaries should resign,” “NRO on highway to hell,” “NRO threat to existence of Pakistan, Shahbaz,” “NRO passage to legitimize corruption, Nawaz,” “Another government U-turn on NRO” and “Corruption and NRO.”

Many people predicted that President Zardari would have to either quit office or hand over all powers to Prime Minister Gilani, that Prime Minister Gilani would ‘break off’ from President Zardari and that the NRO would lead to the collapse of the Zardari-Gilani government.

However, that has not happened. The NRO cases will now be heard by the full bench of the Supreme Court and decisions will finally be made. Some cases which have been lying around for almost 2 decades will be dismissed for lack of evidence and others will be tried afresh in court. There is no need to panic, this is routine.

During this period many important happenings have gone unnoticed in Pakistan – the attacks on the GHQ in Rawalpindi and the ISI office in Peshawar, the story that Omar Saeed Sheikh made the hoax calls that almost led to war between India and Pakistan, Manmohan Singh’s visit to U.S., President Obama’s Afghanistan plan and many things with consequences for Pakistan have not received the attention they should. Veteran journalist Ahmed Rashid even wrote an article of how conspiracy theories and media campaigns have prevented Pakistanis from discussing the real issue.

So why was this sense of panic created? Why was it that when you read the newspapers or turn on the television channels instead of people discussing the threat from terrorism – which is an existential threat to Pakistan – all people are discussing is the NRO.

This is because there are a certain set of people, so-called analysts, pseudo-nationalists and instability creators who keep picking up issues by which they can de-stabilize the civilian democratic government of Pakistan.

Threats to Journalists Threaten Press Freedom

Monday, November 16th, 2009

There is no defense for threatening journalistsThreats to the safety of journalists represent a serious problem in Pakistan, and the danger journalists face in our country has resulted in a respected international NGO ranking press freedom in Pakistan below Afghanistan and Zimbabwe. Unfortunately, some people like Ahmed Quraishi are trying to defend these threats.

Reporters Without Borders recent 2009 Press Freedom Index lists Pakistan at 159 out of 175 nations represented. Mr. Ilhan Niaz took issue with the harsh ranking in Dawn yesterday, saying that “One can only wonder what methodology would enable Pakistan to be bracketed alongside one party dictatorships, theocratic police states and warlord infested polities on the issue of press freedom.” After inquiring with Reporters Without Borders, the newspaper was told that “The bad situation of Pakistan in the ranking is mainly due to the attacks against journalists by [T]aliban and other groups…”

This should not come as too much of a surprise to Mr. Niaz since in May of this year, Reporters Without Borders and International Federation of Journalists sent a joint letter to the President requesting him “to take urgent action to condemn any suggestion or threat of attacks against these three men and other media personnel in Pakistan.”

On Friday, Ahmed Quraishi defended his and other newspapers’ efforts to threaten journalists by unilateraly declaring them spies – a move recently condemned by the Committee to Protect Journalists as well as other Pakistani media outlets and Pakistani blogs.

Quraishi dedicates a significant portion of his column to listing incidents in which journalists engaged in such “unusual activities” as “travelling [sic] to sensitive parts of the country.” In other instances, Quraishi reports incidents that are completely unrelated to journalists or Pakistan, such as John Yettaw’s visit to Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and US special operations agents riding in a car with fake number plates. What do these incidents have to do with journalists? Nothing.

In fact, Quraishi even says in his article, “None of the above might be a spy…” and goes on to defend his paper’s irresponsible behavior by complaining that the US media misreported about Pakistan’s nuclear programme in the past. It’s as if Quraishi thinks that “two wrongs make a right.”

Quraishi, and The Nation’s editorial staff as a whole, continue to miss the deadly point of their actions. Journalists in Pakistan have been repeatedly attacked and murdered – not for being spies, for being journalists.

A brief scan of the Reporters Without Borders haedlines for Pakistan over the past year reveal significant dangers for journalists in Paksitan. Here are only some of the headlines:

Ahmed Quraishi says of the Matthew Rosenberg accusations that “some of our commentators would do well to advise US media representatives to move to Islamabad instead of reporting on Pakistan from New Delhi. That might help the US media reduce some of its hostility toward Pakistan.” But Ahmed Quraishi clearly cannot ensure the safety of Mr. Rosenberg. In fact, he has all but signed his death warrant.

There is no defense for threatening journalists. Threats to journalists threaten press freedom. It is a sad day when international journalists feel they must report on Pakistan from another country because of concerns for their safety. It is a sadder day still when the safety of journalists is made even more threatened by people like Ahmed Quraishi.

Shaheen Sehbai: Journalist or Man with an Agenda

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

It is interesting to note that in today’s The News, the OpEd written by Shaheen Sehbai, an Editor in the newspaper, has been relegated to the inner pages. It seems like even The News governing board has realized that Mr Sehbai is not a journalist, but a campaigner. And that his stories are not based on fact, they are based on conspiracy theories

Let us take a look at today’s story titled ‘Where did the minus-1 formula come from?’. In this story Mr Sehbai alleges that there was a one-to-one meeting between the President and the Prime Minister during which certain issues were discussed. Now, if there was no one else present in the meeting and I am sure President Zardari did not provide Mr Sehbai with information about the meeting, then who did? Did Mr Sehbbai receive information from the Prime Minister himself or from his office? Or did Mr Sehbai receive information from those who “listen” to conversations? Maybe that is what Sehbai means when he repeatedly refers to ‘fly on the wall’ informing him about what happened! But if this is the case then his story is totally unreliable and it is time someone exposed these dubious links.

Mr Sehbai’s piece is not a OpEd piece it is fiction. Here are some snippets. First, “…started taking shape in the power corridors of Islamabad and Rawalpindi when coupled with political failures, there was a torrent of reports of corruption, mainly by people associated and appointed by the presidency on key government and corporate positions, with a turnover of billions in shady deals.” Or “Secret meetings with uniformed star officers were held in the wee hours of cold nights.” And “Political amateurs, who had grabbed the high place coming from tiny bit jobs in hospitals, jails, and stud farms or from apartments in exile, could not keep the secret.” Better still, “A Presidency insider narrated the story of how the lifestyles of people around the president had transformed within weeks and months.” If I am not mistaken this is what we read in most mystery or romantic novels!

Mr Sehbai never mentions his sources, all he does is refers to meeting “politicians, retired and working civil and military bureaucrats, journalists and businessmen.”  If there are so many people he has met and so many who are willing to open up to him – as he supposedly argues – why does he have a problem in telling his viewers who these sources are? How is it that Mr Sehbai knows what is happening behind closed doors, in one-to-one meetings, has the confidence of everyone from the media to the civilian to the military establishment? Who gives him all this information? The public has a right to know especially when all he says about his sources is words to the effect, “A fly on the wall said a Maulana would appear regularly in the PM House to take what he needed and this was no secret.”

Or is it possible that Mr Sehbai has his own agenda. Ten years ago in an article in Dawn titled “The Patient and the Surgeon” (October 22, 1999), Mr. Sehbai described Pakistan as a “patient” and General Musharraf as the “surgeon.” Quoting unnamed sources Mr Sehbai advised General Musharraf on what he should do, namely, “General Musharraf cannot dawdle and straggle any more as he is losing the critical strike time that could give him the advantage of an early sweep against the mafias and layers and layers of corrupt elements all over the place. His administration has a very soft face so far and this has not caused enough fear and panic in the ranks of the corrupt. Publicity  of his image of a relaxed  man sitting with his dogs may have waited until he had shown some results.”

If we look at today’s piece Mr Sehbai seems to be doing exactly the same except this time round he is advising Prime Minister Gilani by asking him to come “out of the shadows of Zardari on the one hand and keep the loyalties of as many PPP MPs as possible so that his government’s majority in parliament is not threatened. The Opposition is helping him out, to a degree.” And further, “ The PM should, therefore, stop all such deals and decisions until he becomes a PM in his own right and the decisions are seen as collective decisions to be implemented in a transparent manner and not dictated to suit the deep pockets of presidential friends who have already made billions. The PM, when he gets out of the shadows of the Presidency, will have to catch these big fish to establish his credibility. Nothing short of a massive hunt for such wheeler dealers with a criminal mind will bring Gilani some credit. He has lived too long as a sheepish lame duck.”

So what we at PMW see is a pattern. Mr Sehbai runs campaigns and conspiracies against individuals and then uses his column to propagate these campaigns. This is not journalism, this is campaigning.

Dawn Eats Crow

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

News agency Dawn has become the latest media outlet to be used as a puppet by political operatives in Pakistan. In a story published on Monday, October 12, Dawn stated that Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani, would be dismissed within 48 hours and he would take over as Presidential spokesperson from Farahtullah Babar.

This report was based on some “Well informed official sources,” and appears to have been first put out by the news service Online. It was given quite a  bit of fanfare, and major international new sources like BBC and CNN quoted Dawn in their reporting.

Well, 48 hours have passed and Ambassador Haqqani is still very deeply ensconced in his position.

So why did a leading Pakistani daily publish this false news? Was the aim to apply psychological pressure on the Zardari-Gilani administration? Or was there some deeper ulterior motive?

The story appears to have been first put out by the news service Online. As is well documented, Online was started under and subsidised by the Musharraf regime. It is quite possible that Musharraf loyalists have planted the rumours in an attempt to destabilize the government. If the report was truly based on information from well informed official sources, it would seem that there has been some attempt to mislead the media and create controversy.

In fact, this is not the first time news media have been used to engineer events instead of reporting them. Rumours have been similarly floated about the removal of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer and Interior Minister Rehman Malik. Others have been used to create the impression of differences between army and civilian government and between President Zardari and PM Gilani.

Whatever the reason behind the rumour, this was not the right thing to do. Even if Ambassador Haqqani resigns or leaves the post sometime in the near future, Dawn will have been proven wrong in an embarrassing lack of professionalism.

This lack of professionalism, though, creates more than just embarrassment for Dawn. In order to properly make decisions about matters of politics, citizens rely on a free and fair media to report well researched facts. If news media are willing puppets for political scheming, the citizens cannot make informed decisions. This is a real threat to the nation.

Today it is Dawn, but tomorrow it could easily be Geo or ARY or any other news source. Let us hope that they all learn from Dawn’s embarrassing mistake and from now on only publish well researched and substantiated facts. No more rumours, please.