<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pakistan Media Watch –– پاکستان میڈیا واچ &#187; Hasan Mansoor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistanmediawatch.com/tag/hasan-mansoor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com</link>
	<description>Pakistan&#039;s media is finally free...but is it fair and factual?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Open Letter to The Telegraph (UK)</title>
		<link>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/11/25/open-letter-to-the-telegraph-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/11/25/open-letter-to-the-telegraph-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahmed Quraishi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azhar Abbas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hasan Mansoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nadeem Paracha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talat Hussain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanmediawatch.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his recent column, &#8220;Pakistani TV performing vital democratic function,&#8221; Mr. Hasan Mansoor does a disservice to the facts about Pakistan&#8217;s media. While TV executives like Azhar Abbas may tell reporters that &#8220;their news helps inculcate democracy and gives a voice to the disenfranchised,&#8221; their actions tell a different story. Rather than reply to media critics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his recent column, &#8220;<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/6651267/Pakistani-TV-performing-vital-democratic-function.html">Pakistani TV performing vital democratic function</a>,&#8221; Mr. Hasan Mansoor does a disservice to the facts about Pakistan&#8217;s media. While TV executives like Azhar Abbas may tell reporters that &#8220;their news helps inculcate democracy and gives a voice to the disenfranchised,&#8221; their actions tell a different story.</p>
<p>Rather than reply to media critics like Nadeem Paracha, Abbas instead suggests that criticism is part of a defensive strategy by the government. He claims that media critics fail to &#8220;counter argument with argument,&#8221; but this is simply not the case. For the BBC, Ahmed Rashid wrote a very eloquent and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8369914.stm">well documented piece about the glut of conspiracy theories in Pakistan&#8217;s media</a>.</p>
<p>Rashid&#8217;s piece echoed sentiments in Adam Ellick&#8217;s excellent post on the New York Times&#8217; blog that featured a video about <a href="http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/tuning-out-the-taliban-in-pakistan-pop/">the failure of pop-music stars to address Taliban violence</a>, choosing instead to focus on anti-Western conspiracy theories. That Pakistani media &#8211; especially TV &#8211; has become a veritable marketplace of nutty conspiracy theories is not news.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the failings of Pakistan&#8217;s media do not stop with harmless conspiracy fantasies. Take, for example, the recent <a href="http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/11/17/breaking-21-international-media-organizations-write-to-government-about-the-nation/">international outcry around Pakistani newspaper The Nation </a>in which a respected American journalist was accused, absent any evidence whatsoever, of being a spy for both the CIA and Israel&#8217;s Mossad.</p>
<p>Did the paper apologize for the obvious ethical problems, not to mention life-threatening dangers, associated with this lapse in judgment? No. Rather, the paper published a semi-coherent diatribe by TV personality and conspiracy theorist extraordinaire, Ahmed Quraishi, in which <a href="http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/11/16/threats-to-journalists-threaten-press-freedom/">Quraishi plead victimhood for The Nation having to suffer criticism for an act that could result in the murder of another American journalist in Pakistan</a>. Have we already forgotten Mr. Daniel Pearl?</p>
<p>Talat Hussain&#8217;s claim that, &#8220;We adopt very democratic methods. Here you find people from both sides,&#8221; is eerily reminiscent of similar claims to &#8220;Fair and Balanced&#8221; reporting from a certain American TV station. This American station also proclaimed that it was giving a voice to the disenfranchised, despite the fact that independent research found that it&#8217;s viewers were less well informed than those of other major news outlets. Imagine a media market saturated with FOX News clones. Hardly a service to democracy.</p>
<p>Sadly, Pakistani TV today serves less a democratic function than a demagogic one. Though free from government intervention and control, TV executives and editorial boards have overwhelmingly opted to promote the sort of fantastic conspiracy theories one expects from basement-run Internet message boards, not responsible commercial media outlets. Mr. Abbas and his colleagues are doing democracy in Pakistan a disservice, and would be well advised to clean up their act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pakistanmediawatch.com/2009/11/25/open-letter-to-the-telegraph-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

