Posts Tagged ‘politicians’

Journalist or Wannabe PTI Media Advisor?

Friday, August 5th, 2011

The problem of political bias in reporting is an ongoing topic of this blog and others. This is a failure of journalistic ethics and professionalism that, unfortunately, is rampant in our media. But rarely do we have the opportunity to see such a textbook example of this behaviour as we do today.

Last year, at a dinner for Imran Khan in Toronto, Canada, an attendee had the foresight to capture on video a conversation between the PTI chief and a senior journalist from Jang Group, Mr Azim M Mian.

During his pandering, Azim Mian brings up his discredited report that Asif Zardari is secretly an American. Azim Mian claims that the information on the website was changed because the all powerful “street harami” Husain Haqqani paid them off. If this is true, Azim should provide some proofs to back up his claim rather than trying to excuse his mistake by blaming the same old bogey.

But even if Azim Mian was correct and someone paid the website to change the information, what would that say about the credibility of the website anyway? If someone could pay the website to change it once, someone else could have paid the website to say something false against Zardari could they not?

When he is talking to Imran Khan, however, it is not just Asif Zardari who is secretly an American infiltrator in the highest levels of Pakistan’s government, but no less than eight ministers also are Americans! Imran Khan is justifiably shocked by this claim. Azim Mian assures him that not only are they American citizens, but they have sworn an oath to sacrifice their lives for America!

If this is true, why is Azim Mian keeping this information secret? Is Jang Group aware that their reporter has information that could be vital to nation interests and yet he is withholding it from the authorities? Will they demand that he provide this evidence to the authorities immediately?

Sadly, this is neither the first time nor is it the last time that Azim Mian has engaged in such bald faced political shenanigans under the cover of journalism. One year ago he reported that Hussain Haroon would resign his post as Ambassador to the UN before August 2010. One year later and Ambassador Haroon remains at his post.

Earlier this year, Mian was caught trying to manufacture controversies about President Zardari trying to make a war on the media by convincing the US Congress to request Secretary Clinton to cancel the visas of certain journalists. After this sensational article was published, we were able to prove that it was another ridiculous conspiracy theory that could not have happened without a time machine.

Another issue that should be considered is how such behaviour ultimately effects politics. Whether or not you support Imran Khan, all political leaders need to be given the facts, not led by their noses on a wild goose chase. By sitting and feeding Imran Khan a plate of bull in an embarrassing attempt to curry his favour, Azim Mian is making a fool out of a political leader by filling his head with fantastic tales and falsehoods.

The question we are left with is whether Jang Group is a serious media group, or a political advisory group? Though this instance involved a Jang reporter, it is not the only culprit in this game of media politics. Is is time for all media groups to show if they have any standards and if there is any accountability for the behaviour of their employees no matter how beyond the pale.

The Nation Still Doesn't Know How Democracy Works

Monday, January 18th, 2010

There is a certain irony to government because people do not like politicians, but, by definition, only politicians can run for political office. This makes for complicated relationships not only between the people and their political leaders, but the political leaders in their offices. The Nation, however, has proposed a modest solution that will solve all of these problems. Government leaders who are also politicians should simply quit. Brilliant!

In the editorial, “President in City,” The Nation writes a disjointed argument that starts by saying that President Zardari’s trip to the provinces proves that the country can continue to run when he is not in Islamabad. I am glad that The Nation has figured this out finally. I am worried, though, that these editors were staying home when Zardari was making overseas trips to the UN or to visit other heads of state. Did they think the country was shut down?

But the really funny part is when The Nation finds out that the President is a politician!

…the President may have realised by now that his position as President is in conflict with his position as head of one of the country’s two largest political parties. 

This realization has apparently caused great concern for the wise old men and women at The Nation. How can someone be a politician and be the leader of all people?

…he is supposed to be the foremost representative of the Federation, indeed its symbol, and should be open to all shades of politics, not just to those belonging to one party. However, the co-chairman of a party is expected to give ear to members of the party whenever he moves into the nation outside his capital.

This made me laugh out loud. Who does The Nation believe should be in government? Someone with no political party? Of course, The Nation‘s editorial page often drips with nostalgia for the bygone days of military dictatorship, so this could very well be true. But Pakistan is no longer a dictatorship (Alhamdulillah), and it is a ridiculous assertion that a democracy would be run by people with no political party. Is USA President Barack Obama not the leader of his Democratic Party? Is UK PM Gordon Brown not the leader of his Labour Party? Is Angela Merkel not the Chancellor of Germany and also the Chairwoman of the Christian Democratic Union political party?

Okay, clearly The Nation does not understand how a democracy works. But what is their solution for the confusing situation in which Mr. Zardari is both President and a politician? He must resign! Naturally! It is almost as if this article was written backwards. I can hear the conversation at The Nation‘s offices now:

“Okay, so we want a new editorial that says Mr. Zardari should resign.”

“Yes, but he seems to be doing everything that we are demanding! He has condemned the drone attacks, he has traveled to the provinces, he is working with opposition parties…what new way can we think to condemn him?”

“I know! We will say he is a politician!” 

Lately I have begun to wonder if Mr. Nadeem Paracha is not secretly writing the editorial page for The Nation as it has become some of the best political satire in the country. According to the logic of The Nation, no politician can be president. Brilliant!

It is clear that The Nation has some vendetta against the President and will not be happy until he resigns. That is certainly their right. But perhaps they should just be honest and write an editorial called, “We have a vendetta against the President and do not have any good reason, but would only like it if he resigns.” This would be much more honest and not require them to write such silliness as saying politicians should not be President.